Girth Comparaison of Animals

[brotherbear]

(04-11-2018, 10:15 PM)Pckts Wrote:

(04-11-2018, 10:09 PM)brotherbear Wrote: IF you wish to compare girth according to height, then we should use bipedal height. The grizzly has a lot more muscle upon his shoulders which are lacking on the tiger. Thus adding inches for the bear, making a shoulder-height usage for a comparison of girth void. Therefore, bipedal-height parity would be fair; such as seven-foot-tall tiger compared with seven-foot tall grizzly. Then compare chest girth. 
 
 

*This image is copyright of its original author

You can't just look up "bipedal height" when looking for species data.
Bipedal height has to do with standing on back legs, body length, posture and spine flexibility are very different on big cats compared to bears, shoulder height is more cut and dry.
Hence why it's one of the 3 common body measurements used during capture.
HBL, Shoulder Height and Weight are the 3 general measuring tools, more exact measurements consist of Limb, neck and body girth.

Yes; I know that. However, head-and-body-length is the proper method which you refuse due to the fact that the grizzly has the greater girth - due to the fact that you don't like the results. Reply