Girth Comparaison of Animals

[Pckts]

(04-03-2018, 11:02 PM)brotherbear Wrote: Pckts says: Of course it does, how else can you determine girth without measuring at the same weight or calculating them accordingly. 
 
That's just plain freaking stupid pckts. So, you see it as fair to down-size the grizzly so as to compare his girth with a tiger? 
Let's say we wish to compare the girth of a reticulated python with that of a green anaconda. The only fair way to compare is with both snakes at length-parity, then measure their circumference at the thickest point of each. No different with tiger and grizzly. At either same bipedal height or head and body length ( pretty much the same ) then you measure the girth; in which case the grizzly wins hands down - and you don't like that. 

Why don't you tone it down with the name calling, do you see Polar or myself calling you stupid because you don't understand lb for lb?

You're comparing snakes not mammals so their measuring is different. We are comparing Neck girth and chest girth, how exactly do you plan on comparing neck and chest girth with snakes?
If you wanted to compare girth at the widest point that would be a different debate, wouldn't it?

Since you're unable to have a mature discussion, I'm going to move on. Reply