Girth Comparaison of Animals

[Pckts]

(04-02-2018, 08:49 PM)brotherbear Wrote: Pckts says: I hope we're past single images to try and make a point. 
 
I figured you already know what a tiger looks like. Compare them on post #66. A tiger appears nearly as thick and heavy as a grizzly when in profile, but when facing you things change. You then clearly see the lack of girth. At true size parity, the tiger should be taller and longer while the bear retains a weight advantage. 

                                                                                                      

*This image is copyright of its original author

What is "True Size?"
Both come in an array of sizes and a Bear will be slightly Taller at the shoulder while a Tiger will be slightly longer in the body but both of these can change depending on the specific individual.

Again... single images?
So you post one to back your point but not others which don't?
That is called "cherrypicking" bud.

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

......

And we can go back and forth but you seem to be missing the point.
Bears are larger than Tigers, that isn't the debate, the point is when they are at equal weights "parity" there is significant overlap in muscle composition and thus trying to determine one being stronger than the other isn't cut and dry. Compare a 200kg Bear to a 200kg Tiger, both can be full grown individuals and both will show very similar muscular measurements. 
Outside of that, I have no other dog in this fight. Reply