|
Size comparisons
|
Sauroposeidon holotype (Paleo-King) vs Mamenchisaurus sinocanadorum (Greg Paul)
Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50/size-comparison-scale?page=84#ixzz63Ngf9J86
Max Palaeoloxodon recki (Larramendi) vs Mamenchisaurus sinocanadorum (Greg Paul)
Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50/size-comparison-scale?page=84#ixzz63NgruVJN
Argentinosaurus (Paleo-King) vs Mamenchisaurus sinocanadorum (Greg Paul). 148 tons in total!
Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50/size-comparison-scale?page=84&scrollTo=48690
(sorry if it looks a bit blurry but this is the best I could do)
Here's AMNH 5027 T rex compared with some of the true titans of the dinosaur world: Sauroposeidon holotype (60 tons), Mamenchisaurus sinocanadorum (75 tons), OMNH 1331 Apatosaurus (95 tons), BYU Barosaurus (100 tons), and Futalognkosaurus holotype (50 tons) Credit to Scott Hartman for skeletals of T rex, Barosaurus, Apatosaurus, and Futalognkosaurus. Sauroposeidon is by PaleoKing, while Mamenchisaurus sinocanadorum is by Greg Paul Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/search/results?captcha_id=captcha_search&display_as=0&page=5&search=Search&what_at_least_one=sinocanadorum&who_only_made_by=0#ixzz63W0HRgDA
Siegsdorf woolly mammoth (Larramendi) vs UCMP 12681 Triceratops (Hartman). Take note of the Triceratops' advantage in robusticity; the mammoth is 3.5 m shoulder height and 8 tons, while the Triceratops is 3 meters shoulder height and 12 tons.
Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50/size-comparison-scale?page=84#ixzz63YgcnB9Y  (10-27-2019, 05:54 PM)DinoFan83 Wrote: Siegsdorf woolly mammoth (Larramendi) vs UCMP 12681 Triceratops (Hartman). Take note of the Triceratops' advantage in robusticity; the mammoth is 3.5 m shoulder height and 8 tons, while the Triceratops is 3 meters shoulder height and 12 tons. Can you make a comparison between the largest Deinosuchus and Purussaurus and largest theropods such as Tyrannosaurus, Giganotosaurus, Spinosaurus, Carcharodontosaurus, Mapusaurus, etc.? (10-27-2019, 08:44 PM)johnny rex Wrote:(10-27-2019, 05:54 PM)DinoFan83 Wrote: Siegsdorf woolly mammoth (Larramendi) vs UCMP 12681 Triceratops (Hartman). Take note of the Triceratops' advantage in robusticity; the mammoth is 3.5 m shoulder height and 8 tons, while the Triceratops is 3 meters shoulder height and 12 tons. Yep. I already have a Carcharodontosaurus vs Purussaurus size chart on The World of Animals; in addition I know of Purussaurus vs Spinosaurus size chart by Verdugo. I'll post them and more when I have time.
Megaraptor vs Giganotosaurus - average vs average (Megaraptor is based on Wikimedia Murusraptor skeletal, while Giganotosaurus by Scott Hartman)
Average great white shark (4.6 meters, 1 ton) vs Baryonyx holotype (10 meters, ~3.3 tons scaling from Greg Paul's estimate of 9 meters and 2.5 tons) on top, record great white shark (6 meters, 2.5 tons) vs estimated Suchomimus adult size (~12 meters and 5+ tons). Great white shark is credited to Wikimedia Commons while the skeletals are by Scott Hartman.
Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50/size-comparison-scale?page=84#ixzz63efXTwjf
2 of Mongolia's extinct apex predators - Sarkastodon vs Tarbosaurus, max vs max. 200 kg vs 7 tons.
Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50/size-comparison-scale?page=63&scrollTo=44156 Sarkastodon is by blaze and specimen AMNH 26641, while Tarbosaurus is by Franoys and specimen PIN 551-1   *This image is copyright of its original author
 *This image is copyright of its original author http://domainofthebears.proboards.com/thread/37/visual-comparisons?page=3&page= Credited to Brobear. |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 18 Guest(s) |