Indo-Chinese and Malayan tigers

[GuateGojira]

(09-11-2018, 06:50 AM)peter Wrote: In your post, you said you have some doubts on Miquelle's mails. You don't trust the source, to be precise. My advice is to contact Miquelle, Kerley or Goodrich yourself. Miquelle has a few doubts about 'forums' in general. Goodrich said most records of Amur tigers are unreliable. Based on the mails I saw, Kerley would be my choice. Best way to solve all problems in the method department, as it will eliminate interpretations once and for all.    

As you know, I don't trusth in Waveriders at all, I don't know if the "email" of Dr Miquelle is real or not. I had answers from Dr Goodrich before, but it seems that he changed his email. I already tried to contact the 3 but there was no result.

From pictures, like I said, there is a cacophony acording with pictues, one in a straight line, other straight but along the curves, other with the tape curved but not presed in the back and other with the tape completelly lose along all the curvatures. Based in the document of Kerley et al. (2005) it only quotes Nowell & Jackson (1998) about the method but that is all. In fact, In my tables I am going to change from "straight line" to "along the curves" but that is all, I can't corroborate emails that I have not received, specially for unreliable posters.

About the email of Dr Simcharoen, I don't think that there is a problem to put the email here. Let me finish the comparison email with the new measurements and I will put it here too, for the database. Reply