Bear Anatomy

[Shadow]

(12-10-2018, 01:46 AM)Panther Wrote:

(12-10-2018, 01:20 AM)Shadow Wrote: I still don´t get your point here. Yes, polar bears are biggest bears what comes to size in average. But what are you now trying to say with these charts? 

Kodiak bears are commonly agreed to be the biggest subspecies of brown bears and biggest known individuals of brown bears are Kodiaks. Are you trying to prove that to be not true or what is your point? Or do you have any point here what you are trying to say? I am curious about your agenda here, that´s all.

Why are so curious about my agenda? I'm just showing the average of Kodiak bear is no way near to polar bear in that thread. I have no agenda or nothing. I'll always go through facts.
 
And I never denied Kodiak bears are largest species of Brown bears, but I'm just not sure about that. I also remembered brotherbear or Grizzly claws discussing about Kodiak bear and Alaska peninsula brown bear sizes overlap on averages. 

Quote:Because if you try to say, that Kodiaks aren´t the biggest brown bears, then I wait some real reasoning and good information backing you up. That one chart isn´t good enough for such claim. I would ask this same from anyone making such claim. So is that your case or not?

That's really not one chart I posted. Also I'm (as I said before) not here to prove Kodiak bears aren't the largest species of Brown bears. I just showed the research to epaiva's estimated average.

Of course it is interesting to understand what someone is wanting to show if there is quoted some chart or document. That´s why I asked about your agenda so, that it is easier to understand what you want to point out. There are so many research documents, that naturally there are time to time some contradictions or at least information which can look like to be contradictory before looking closer to details. But it was nice to get some clarity here, because bears are interesting animals. Reply