There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
That's table is not actual proof its just conclusion base on some individual.
I have lot of sources that claim Siberian are bigger 100 of blogs and expert from different source
But as gaute said its matter of credibility of the source. Just like these 100 blogs and lot of expert can not of taken as 100% confirmation for Siberian bigger than bengal
In same manner your proof didn't universal truth of Bengal are bigger than Siberian. Its just study which yet not verified by scientist.
Though I respect Guate post, But I still think If plenty of food and favorable condition is provided Siberian can grow larger than bengal on an average (Dimension wise only). But I agree Bengal are heavier.
And this is my last post in response, I don't want to Ruin the thread I have already a thread on Debate section that can be used to discuss on these tigers
DNA samples of Bengal tigers polluted by genes of the Siberian Tiger
