There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Wild animals information on public places also have bad consequences ?

India sanjay Offline
Co-owner of Wildfact
*****
#11

Here is the article that show posting of endangered animal information on social network website are misused by poachers.

A park in South Africa, put up a notice requesting tourists not to tag photographs of rhinoceroses posted to the internet with locations, because these images could help to lead poachers to the endangered animals.

*This image is copyright of its original author


"Poachers have more information of wild animals than any tourist" - Anish Andheria, president of the Wildlife Conservation Trust. He said "We go to reserves because we love it, but poachers are dependent on it for their lives. Poachers sometimes know more about wildlife than protectors of forest."

However, experts in India remain unconvinced that this could be a serious threat to Indian reserves. The threat of cyber-poaching in the Indian context, they say, seems unlikely for now.

Even a successful attempt to hack the Wildlife Institute’s systems is unlikely to help poachers much. According to Shardul Bajikar, editor of Natural History at wildlife magazine Saevus, only eight or nine tigers in the country have been radio-tagged for monitoring. he said "It is an insignificant fraction of the overall tiger population"

Poachers could access a much bigger, current and updated information of tigers from locals and have absolutely no need whatsoever to use geotagged images, which may be from any time and date in past or hack radio collars which will help them access a small number of tigers who are being better tracked and protected best.

All three maintained that poachers rely on local sources and their own knowledge of their prey’s rhythms, not on technology, to source their information.

Geo-tagging is also not a big problem at any point, even as more of India is accessing internet through their smartphones. Tourists in India are legally permitted access to only 20% of a reserve, whereas in Africa and Australia, they have much freer access. This means that only those animals that frequent that part of the reserve are in particular danger of being photographed, let alone being tracked down days later.
1 user Likes sanjay's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Wild animals information on public places also have bad consequences ? - sanjay - 08-18-2014, 02:21 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB