Massive Head, Neck & Muscles

[paul cooper]

(01-21-2018, 06:25 AM)Stealthcat Wrote:

(01-21-2018, 04:23 AM)Amnon242 Wrote: Someone could say that I only selected the photos where the lions have weak arms. But I do not think I have pictures of lions on which their strong arms would be well visible. I would probably find my other photos of lions with exposed arms, but I think they would look similar

If you scrunch the arm it always looks bigger.  I'm not disagreeing tigers have the stronger arms, I  actually have a  few photos, but captive lions generally have the mane covering most of the arm and all over shoulder, it is the upper parts of their frame where the mane covers that I believe they are stronger, the lower limbs appear to be for endurance, some triceps I think can tie tigers, but on the whole the tiger needs the stronger tricep to flex the forearm.  The lion needs the stronger back muscles and shoulders trapezius to move the humerus, swing the arm.  

Here is an Asiatic lion, I think its sort of semi wild captive not sure, notice the shoulder mass, the muscles over it are more developed, Supraspinatus, omotransversarius, which you can make out on many lions. 

*This image is copyright of its original author

LOL, why, what is the reason for you to "believe" the that upper for the lion is "stronger"? No reason whatsoever, just retardedness. In your picture the lion isnt too big on the shoulder, its the scapula sticking out, with meat on it, no different from tigers. Most of it is illusions. Why would the lion need to swing the arm? It doesnt make any sense what you are saying, LOL. Reply