There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

Poll: Who is the largest tiger?
Amur tiger
Bengal tiger
They are equal
[Show Results]
 
 
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who is the "king" of tigers? - Bengal or Amur

Sri Lanka Apollo Away
Bigcat Enthusiast
*****
( This post was last modified: 02-08-2015, 04:17 PM by Apollo )

(02-08-2015, 09:26 AM)'tigerluver' Wrote: I was not aware that, "the period between the kill of the bait and the capture was less than 10 hours (they were revisited before the 6:00 am)." Therefore, say a tiger got to the bait immediately and ate during those 10 hrs, from the average intake reported of 14 kg/24 hr (disregarding portions of bait no actually eaten by the tiger), would have eaten 5.8 kg. Likely, most tigers did not reach the bait that early, and even if they did, 5.8 kg of food mass would not be the mass in stomach at weighing due to metabolism. All in all, from the average figure and the reported timings, the average tiger would only have 3 kg of stomach content from the bait as weighing.

The complex situation on food correction as presented in all this information is another reason why it may be superfluous in most cases. There was already metabolism and competition intricating the equation, and Guate has pointed out time as another factor. All these factors and yet there is a poor grasp of what these parameters were for each specimen, thus food content estimations would be just as poor.


 



Very good point.
As the tigers were said to eat 14 to 19 Kg in 24hrs undisturbed, then for 10hrs it comes down to 5.8 to 7.9 Kg.


*This image is copyright of its original author


As mentioned before the consumed mass wont be the same as the mass available in the stomach due to digestion and metabolism.
We know tigers have a higher metabolic rate compared to other bigcats, which results in more energy (calories) burnt.
Remember that very large percentage of meat is nothing but water (around 70% and above) which will be used and excreted out of the body much faster than say protiens and fat.


*This image is copyright of its original author


 

 
2 users Like Apollo's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Who is the "King" of the tigers? - Apollo - 02-08-2015, 03:58 PM



Users browsing this thread:
13 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB