|
Can someone explain this..
|
 (01-29-2015, 10:58 AM)'GrizzlyClaws' Wrote: When it comes to the density of the canine teeth, the order should be: Actually, the largest Canines ever measured belong to Madla (Bengal Tiger) same with the largest skull I believe. Its like splitting hairs when trying to compare large amurs or bengals. When it comes to captivity, it is always reported through circus info that Siberian are by far the largest. But we must take this with a grain of salt since most "bengals" used where hybrids between multiple tiger sub species and also from areas nearer to Java, Sumatra I believe (not certain), Peter can expand more on this. But if you look at the measurements of captive siberians that was posted here with weights around 240kg-270kg the skull size, body length and canine size are all in normal levels and some even being smaller than bengals measured. Its interesting to research. One last thing, there are almost zilch Pure bred captive bengals to go off of. They all live in india and up until recently, india didn't have the proper nutritional requirements needed to support these cats but now they are better and you can see their sizes improving in some images. But you still have practically nothing to go off so you cant compare them to others. On a side note, could somebody supply the link that peter is talking about in regards to the write up from the person who can interpret Korean? May be Pm'ing it is a better option to avoid derailment. Thanks again |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |