The Lion King 2019

[GuateGojira]

(01-14-2019, 11:06 AM)Panther Wrote: Yeah, maybe story part of warner is of course a little better. But for animation, even for baloo and bagheera Disney's one is better for me! 

The problem is, they put old human facials for the animals like baloo and bagheera. But even in real world, old animal doesn't look like that, but like baloo and bagheera from Disney!

Yes, that is correct, Disney animals ARE animals, while Warner animals are like cartoons of animals. Even then, somehow, I like the face of Baloo and Baghera of Warner. I am not saying that is better, just that I like it too. Now I don't like the face of Shere Khan of Warner, it looks completelly unreal.

Now, while the faces of the wolves seems weird, the body is actually more accurate in Warner than in Disney. The wolves of Warner look like Indian wolves, while those from Disney look like Eurasian wolves. Check the Indian wolves:

*This image is copyright of its original author

Now check the Eurasian ones:

*This image is copyright of its original author

This images are from the book "Canids of the World" of José Castelló of 2018, an incredible book by the way!

Now, while the end of the Warner movie was, somehow, better, the Warner movie lacks the incredible figth of Shere Khan with Baloo/Baghera/wolves (the best part for me!), but this is because the lanky tiger of Warner will be no match to any of them, while the tiger from Disney, like I say before, is the perfect example of the big Bengal male tigers in our days. Reply