Cryptozoology, Ghosts, Aliens and other mysteries

[Pckts]

Its not a beak its bone.http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/...onster.php — NRen2k5(TALK), 00:30, 7 August 2008 (UTC) This has been quoted and sourced in the article for a few days now. --McGeddon (talk) 08:56, 7 August 2008 (UTC) And not where it matters. The source positively identifies the carcass as that of a raccoon, but the wiki article only quotes it for some minor details. — NRen2k5(TALK), 10:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)


But this is exactly what I am talking about, this is conspiracy non sense, "animal research facility close by"
What research facility, how many other research facilities exist, how do you know where it came from since it washed a shore, etc.
Anybody can make up more and more questions, but the end of the day, there is no bigfoot, no sasquatch, no Montauk monster, no chupacabra no Yeti, no Locness monster, etc.

The animals that exist are proven, studied and accepted. Until a new creature meets those requirements, it simply doesn't exist. Reply