There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Big Prehistoric Mammalian Herbivores ~

India brotherbear Offline
Grizzly Enthusiast
#14
( This post was last modified: 01-30-2018, 04:22 PM by brotherbear )

Doing the crawl?                                                     https://twilightbeasts.wordpress.com/201...the-crawl/
Posted on April 25, 2016 by twilightbeasts
The life aquatic has lured many animal groups back into its liquid embrace. Marine iguanas, penguins, whales and dolphins, sea-cows and manatees, seals and sea-lions all returned to the sea from land (and air!) adapted forms. It makes a lot of sense- the littoral is a pretty rich zone that surely tempted those that could take advantage of it. From there it is but a short evolutionary jump back into the blue. Many animals are already halfway there, with one hoof in each camp. Think of the hippo, the beaver, the desman, the otter. Given the wide variety of creatures that have done this, it can be fun to imagine future forms. Bat-penguins? River-antelopes? Water-wombats?
Flights of fancy like this have a long pedigree. Darwin himself, in The Origin mentions:
“In North America the black bear was seen by Hearne swimming for hours with widely open mouth, thus catching, like a whale, insects in the water. Even in so extreme a case as this, if the supply of insects were constant, and if better adapted competitors did not already exist in the country, I can see no difficulty in a race of bears being rendered, by natural selection, more and more aquatic in their structure and habits, with larger and larger mouths, till a creature was produced as monstrous as a whale.”
Sea-bears? Why not!
As usual, nature is not only weirder than we imagine, but weirder than we can imagine. Perhaps the most unlikely group ever to have flirted with the aquatic lifestyle was only recently recognised from Pliocene fossils: Thalassocnus sp. Thalassocnus is, and I can’t really believe this either, a giant marine sloth.

The first clues to this puzzle were due to some flukes of taphonomy. The Pisco Formation in Peru is a richly stratified Miocene and Pliocene site with amazing preservation of marine creatures including articulated whales, dolphins, crocodiles, fish, sharks, and dugongs. And giant sloths. Now, you don’t usually expect to find giant sloths in a strictly marine site. But these sloths were quickly identified as something pretty special indeed. Detailed study has shown that not only were these behemoths at home in a marine shore environment, they had picked up some pretty cool adaptations along the way. 
 
Neater still, the layers of the Pisco Formation contains thalassocnine sloths from multiple timepoints between the Miocene and Pliocene, showing how some of those characters changed through time. It seems that this shallow prehistoric sea was prone to occasional algal red blooms that regularly poisoned everything, leaving articulated skeletons behind. Through these fossils, you can actually see evolution happening. In the ribs and limbs you find a gradual thickening of the cortical bone; an increase in density that helped to counteract the natural buoyancy of an air-breathing mammal. There is also a gentle elongation of the premaxillae and mandible symphysis, creating a long and wide snout, better adapted to munching water-weeds. The earlier species of thalassocnine have lots and lots of striae on their weird, peg-like sloth teeth- indicating that they were taking in a lot of sand while they were feeding, probably due to wading in shallow water where any movement would stir up lots of sediment. The later species don’t have this. Suggesting that they were feeding further out to sea, where sand wasn’t an issue.
1 user Likes brotherbear's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Indricotheres - Kingtheropod - 05-19-2017, 12:57 AM
Diprotodon - epaiva - 08-02-2017, 07:07 PM
RE: Diprotodon - epaiva - 09-06-2017, 03:32 AM
Sloths and Armadillos - brotherbear - 01-30-2018, 04:19 PM
RE: Sloths and Armadillos - brotherbear - 01-30-2018, 04:22 PM
RE: Sloths and Armadillos - brotherbear - 01-30-2018, 04:30 PM



Users browsing this thread:
5 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB