There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
04-22-2014, 10:16 AM( This post was last modified: 04-22-2014, 10:16 AM by GuateGojira )
I think that I have not explained myself very clear. What I want to say was that from the entire canine, 60% was in the skull and 40% was for the crown. For this last percentage 5-10% would correspond to the gum line, so the canine length measured from the tip to the gum line would be between 30-35% of the canine itself. However, I think that I exaggerated a little and that the gum line will be no more than the 5% of the crown length, which suggest that from a canine, the 35% will correspond to the tooth length from the tip to the gum.
We need data for comparison, at the moment, I don't know of any specimen that have both type of measurements.