Estimating Male size based off the Female

[tigerluver]

*This image is copyright of its original author

From the the frame, he's 1.15x thicker at the chest. I'd adjust it to 1.2x for distance. With adjustments and looking at body length without head, he is not much longer than her, maybe 1.07x. Length estimate is 160 kg and chest diameter estimate is 224 kg, averaging 192 kg. However, I think the female is longer than average (thus over 130 kg), I doubt BMW would be anywhere near 160 kg as the length estimate predicts.

*This image is copyright of its original author

They are too far apart, but the male in the back for the worth of the frame is barely smaller. Meaning, he is likely significantly larger than the male closer to the camera.

*This image is copyright of its original author

Male in the bear is 1.022x longer for what is on the frame. We could adjust it to 1.04x perhaps for distance. Looks to be 1.04x thicker (in the other photo) and we can adjust that to 1.06x. Length estimate for the back male is then 225 kg and chest estimate is 238 kg, averaging 232 kg. This is assuming the foreground male is 200 kg.

Bear:

*This image is copyright of its original author

I only messed with chest diameter. From the frame, he is actually smaller than her but that is obviously due to how far away he is. This is a very hard to picture to measure from. All I can say is that from the distance he away from the camera, he is still matching the chest diameter of the female in front, as is probably 1.2-1.3x their thickness, so 400-500 kg based on a 227 kg female. Reply