There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
07-08-2022, 01:52 AM( This post was last modified: 07-08-2022, 02:07 AM by Pckts )
(07-08-2022, 01:46 AM)Twico5 Wrote:
(07-07-2022, 11:35 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(07-07-2022, 11:19 PM)Styx38 Wrote:
(07-07-2022, 04:09 PM)Pckts Wrote:
(07-07-2022, 03:27 AM)Luipaard Wrote:
(07-06-2022, 01:50 AM)Styx38 Wrote:
(07-03-2022, 03:42 AM)Pckts Wrote: There’s a big difference between the trees in Africa which are thicker with more weight bearing branches and the Sal trees in India which are thin with small branches.
Fair enough.
However, wouldn't Leopards be even less arboreal
in the arid regions of the Middle East and the Fir forests of the Caspian, Himalayas and Northern China/Ussuri?
The Fir tree branches do not seem ideal for a Leopard to perform a prolonged chase on primate and other small animals. Not to mention that they are apex predators in some of these regions, so even less use of trees.
The Leopards could hoist their kills on a few occasions in temperate forests.
Pckts is wrong. There's enough footage of Indian leopards mating and fighting in trees. Those instances did not take place in Sal trees. Both India and the African continent have a great variation in trees.
India is filled with either Teak or Sal, the largest reserves in C. India of course are Sal. You have no clue what you’re talking about and neither Teak nor Sal are as good for stashing or resting in trees as compared to the Acacias in E. Africa or the Sausage and Marula trees in S. Africa.
Both Indian varieties are tall and thin while the Africans are thick branches with heavy leaf cover and thick tops.
What about the Crocodile Bark tree of Southern India or the Fir trees of the Himalayas?
If I am correct, don't Leopards cache their kills more often in Southern India?
I'm not familiar with either tree type so I'm not as sure to speak on them but my guess would be that the lusher vegetation seen in S. India would definitely help Leopards with caching their kills. I also think Leopards tend to be a bit more bold and look a little larger in S. India IMO. I feel like Kabini and Bandipur for instance produce some bigger looking Leopards and more often than Kanha/Tadoba even though both have a healthy Tiger population as well.
Trees in the western ghats region (kabini and bandipur are both in this region) are definitely easier to climb and stash kills in for leopards. Leopards in this region are large, yes, but this is probably because the tiger populations there are small. Tigers are really rare in the hilly areas of the western ghats and are almost never seen.
Tiger density in Bandipur is similar if not higher than Kanha. Tiger density won't negatively impact Leopard size if the prey base is large and the terrain accommodates ample areas for the smaller predator to escape.