There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

Poll: Who is the largest tiger?
Amur tiger
Bengal tiger
They are equal
[Show Results]
 
 
  • 3 Vote(s) - 3.33 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Who is the "king" of tigers? - Bengal or Amur

United States Dragoon Offline
New Join

(06-10-2022, 06:02 AM)GuateGojira Wrote:
(06-10-2022, 12:16 AM)Dragoon Wrote: Hello @GuateGojira

I hope you are doing well!
I'm new to the forums so forgive me if I make any mistakes. 

I was wondering If the weight average for the tiger is calculated with stomach content? 

I was also wondering if we could create a distribution between Amur and Bengle tigers? I think it would be interesting to see the standard deviation between the two.

Hi, nice to meet you.

Sure, we can create that distribution. Tell me what do you need and I will provide it to you.

About the stomach content, with lions and tigers, is partially included, but let me explain. All the studies and hunting records of great cats ignore the point of the stomach content, they just recorded the figures and leave it like that. Only three authors (Smuts (with South Africa lions only), Bertram and the Maharaja of Cooch Behar) adjusted some of they weights for stomach content. After that, none do that with lions and tigers. Now, as we know the single specimens from Nepal, I adjuted them using the figures of Sunquist (1981), but that is all. Once I consulted Dr Sunquist about this issue and he told that if I am going to adjust all the records of the tigers, I should adjust all the records of all the other cats to make a fair comparison, a work that will be titanic and at the end, impossible. So, in conclution, some of the records of the tigers are adjusted for stomach content, and all of the figures that clearly mentioned any stomach content (like "gorged" or "full of beef") were remouved from the sample. The remaning figures were left like they are assuming that the inevitable inclusion of young or ill specimens in the old hunting records will level any stomach content that could be included by error in the sample, and the same process was done with lions, jaguars and leopards.
Great! 
Do you have the weight data of the adjusted wild bengal and amur tigers? I have a program that can help me create a normal distribution and I'd like to compare and contrast. I'd also like to include wild lion weights. How large is your sample size for each species? 
Thank you! 
Best regards.
1 user Likes Dragoon's post
Reply




Messages In This Thread
RE: Who is the "king" of tigers? - Bengal or Amur - Dragoon - 06-10-2022, 10:04 AM



Users browsing this thread:
24 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB