Modern weights and measurements on wild tigers

[abhisingh7]

(04-15-2022, 01:00 AM)GuateGojira Wrote:

(04-14-2022, 11:17 PM)abhisingh7 Wrote: GuateGojira U Havn\t  included many large tigers in the list some of them are well documented too' https://www.youtube.com/watch?v='p4UydvVBovU and some of them are well verified like 320kg tiger hunted in nepal 1942 or 317kg colonal wagh tiger , these tigers have photographs and have large measurements  which looks in their picture .  yeah this is the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p4UydvVBovU this male was estimated live 272kg on very old  documentary ,yes 320 kg nepal tiger is very much reliable (could be 290-306 empty ), but what i meant to say those hunted  tigers who have measurements and pics you should keep them in valid hunting record and those verified by scientist like 320kg male you should keep it in scientific records .

I made a short analisys about all the exceptional weights of tigers above 272 kg in litterature, the list is not too long.

*This image is copyright of its original author

Now, why I did not include them? Well, one reason is the reliability, which at least two of them are reliable enough to actually include them with no problem (281 kg and 320 kg), but the other reason is that they are "exceptional" and I want to show that I am not biased in my figures and also that we don't need to include exceptional especimens to inflate the figures in order to show that tigers are bigger, like other "people" do with the maned cat (you know what I mean).

By the way, the link of the video doesn't work, please check it and put it again.

Reply