are male african Lion more muscular and robust than the Tigers?

[LonePredator]

(12-24-2021, 12:13 PM)Rafido Wrote: National geographic said that lions have the highest percentage of muscle among all mammals.

https://twitter.com/natgeowild/status/67...81/photo/1

Please STOP BELIEVING Nat Geo. Nat Geo is a TERRIBLE source of information. They always keep giving out WRONG information.

First of all African male lions were only compared with 40 other mammal species and Tigers were NOT among those 40. So the lions only had more muscle percentage than those 40 species. And also Tigers and Jaguars are the most robust while Lion comes at number 2 according to all the ACTUAL studies.

And Nat Geo also said that Siberian Tigers are 400cm long, nearly 6 feet tall and weigh upto 300kg. And ALL OF THIS IS FALSE!

No Siberian Tiger (or Bengal) in the history of earth has ever been 400cm long or 6 feet tall. NEVER IN THE HISTORY OF EARTH! And no wild Siberian Tiger (at least in the 21st century) has ever been weighed in at 300kg.

Here is the ridiculously stupid information that was posted by NatGeo on their YouTube channel in a video called 'Tigers 101'. You can also see it in their own video at 0:59 timestamp in the link below

https://youtu.be/FK3dav4bA4s @ 0:59

This is what they showed in it:

    Reply