Lions of Sabi Sands

[Potato]

For the Birmingham vs Majingilane comparisons first of all we have to distinguish being strong and being successfull which are 2 different thinks which not necessary goes along each others. What it comes to who is stronger then that should be quite clear. Significantly past their prime Majings even with numericall dissadvantages were chassing prime Birminghams through their own territory. Also Birminghams ruled in very easy times while Majingilanes had hard competition through the years and the list of defeated by them coalitions through the years goes on and on. 

(10-22-2021, 11:11 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote: Bboys until this year (only 2 and out of prime) didn't lost inch of their territory against their will.

lol that is so untrue that I would line up that claims with such as "Mlovathis lost to MAjingilanes only cus Mr T was darted by evil rangers"

(10-22-2021, 11:11 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote: You mentioned  how Majingilanes chased Matimbas (4 vs 2) but you didn't mentioned Nhenha and Tinyo vs 4 Nwaswitshakas?

Southern Avocas also chassed 4 N'was around so it seems it is not that huge of a deal. Also it is not like N'was were challanging Birminghams over their territory, they were just on "reconnaissance mission" further north and they were resonably over caution back then. It is kind of like bringing up Mala Mala raports of Mlovathis chassing around 5 Majings before the really challanged Mlovathis in June 2010 saying Mlovathis actually defeated 5 Majings. 

(10-22-2021, 11:11 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote: People have that narrative that because Bboys didn't kill males in their territory takeovers, they are not fighters or "vicious" like Majingilanes for example who killed 2 males in their takeovers, which is funny, as they would definitely kill any male if they had a chance to do so, as it is in lions takeovers.. 

I do not think there is anyone who think like that. In fact both those both those coalitions killed 2 males each if we count only that which are 100% confirmed, not just speculated so I do not get where that argument even came from.



If were are comparing their success then:
1. Majings ruled in way more difficult times if we take it into accout.
2. Majings ruled longer.
3 Majings ruled more pride.
4. Size of the ruled territory should be around evenly matched most of the time tho after Avocas went after BBoys, their territory became quite thin. 
5. Amount of raised offspring - idk, but I think Majings should also there be ahead tho I did not made proper count. Reply