There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
12-20-2020, 05:21 AM( This post was last modified: 04-23-2021, 01:10 AM by DinoFan83 )
I thought these might be a helpful addition to this thread.
Here are some conversations I have had with Scott Hartman regarding the validity of his original estimates for Giganotosaurus compared to the significantly larger estimates I have outlined above from GetAwayTrike, Greg Paul, and SpinoInWonderland. The messages in these screenshots should be very important to consider for anyone who thinks the estimates in this thread that make the animal quite a bit larger than Scott's original estimates are inaccurate just because they are larger.
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
EDIT 04/22/2021: As can be seen in the above images, Hartman suggests that the ribcage would probably be narrower regardless of the pectoral girdle. I didn't really notice this until somebody elsewhere pointed it out, so I went and asked Hartman what he meant. Here is that conversation.
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
Given that he doesn't think my inflating the ribcage based on Acrocanthosaurus' proportions is unreasonable, I see no reason to think so either. At this point, anyone who wants to use estimates lower than the ones in this thread will have to justify that very, very well.