About methods, measurements, errors, baits and the art of debating

[GuateGojira]

Hello @Pckts, there is no problem, you can post this in Carnivora.

In fact, I see that the stupid of @WaveRiders is still afraid of coming here and is hiding there. He post another bullsh.... there (same post 44): http://carnivoraforum.com/topic/9329122/3/

He insist that  the base of the neck is in the lower part, let's show him his mistake again: 

*This image is copyright of its original author

Incredible that this ignorant and liar (because we now know what he is) insist in his own "believes" but this is simply because he is just another crazy lion-fanatic, so this is not a conversation about "science", is just the old issue of hard-core-lion-fans stick in the "vs" debate.

Check this image of one of the larger lions:

*This image is copyright of its original author

This lion is Hpl-6 (Masialeti) and measured 160 cm in head-body, the image show that size (he is barely longer than the Pantanal jaguar of 148 kg or the Sumatran tiger of the same weight) and check that is obvious that he had some stomach content. He is not comparable to other truly large males, like for example some truly large males from Hwange NP in Zimbabwe, which reached a head-body of up to 209 cm measured in the same way.

As we can see, those lions are not particularly large, the longest barely c.180 cm, however as he is a biased hard-core tiger hater, he insist that those lions were incorrectly or incompletely measured. However, why in the world are going these "true" scientists to present incomplete measurements? That can only possible in the silly brain of Waves (of trash).

He also insist in quoting post from 2014, JAJAJAJAJA! He is so stupid that the only thing that he can do is to show old "mistakes" (and already corrected ones). But let's face it, he has nothing better to do, as he has no honor, no credibility and is just a common troll. Check that the other poster still ignore him. However, check my table of February 2014:

*This image is copyright of its original author

I already corrected that misunderstanding in that same month, so his silly try of show a "mistake" is simply idiotic, but that is how the "Waver of garbage" work. Reply