Wild Animals India vs Africa

[GuateGojira]

Africa is a great continent, full with all the types of climates that you can imagine. Asia is even larger, with territories that goes beyond our own imagination. A comparison between then is simply impossible is such a small scale, as they have similar animals but also have they own particular fauna in some areas. Interestingly, in the case of the lions, Africa had both subspecies, the African per se in the sub-Saharan region and the Asiatic lion in the west of Africa, the last remnant of an once large population that also occupied the north of Africa (the Barbary region).

However, India itself is by no means in disadvantage with the entire African continent, no, it is the great subcontinent, slightly smaller than Europe and full with a magnificent fauna and also all the climates that you can imagine. I don't want to sound biased at this point, but India is magnificent, and like I have said many times, I fully agree with Jim Corbett: I love India!!!

I think that the point of @jeets is to compare the great mammals of both areas, and possibly also the great reptiles, I think. Maybe, if Jeets could present focused areas, in the case of Africa, it will be easier. For example, we can en-globe India like one single area, as its large mammals live in almost all its habitats, but with Africa, we could manage at least four habitats:

1. The east of Africa (Kenya and Tanzania like the principal).
2. The South of Africa (definitely Kruger animals).
3. The desert of Namibia.
4. The forest of West Africa.

I know that we can even take more areas, but this seems to be the principals, from my point of view. There is also the north of Africa, but I don't have much information from there, apart from the extinct Barbary lion.

So, what do you think of this separation for an easier management? By the way, will you like to see a comparative image with all the great mammals and reptiles from each region? : Reply