There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
Dr. Packer states Crater have bigger chest girths, and supposedly we have these numbers. Remember the regression I did? That equation is the same method of the 212 kg estimate and isn't flawed. It's also powerful due to sample size. That's why I think the regression method is the best way to find an estimate for the Crater weights. Also, I feel both length and chest girths should be taken into account as a product of the two against weight for accuracy of estimation. Most ecologists are more focused on the conservation and ecological math, that's probably why no one has used the allometry methods.