Hunting success - Printable Version +- WildFact (https://wildfact.com/forum) +-- Forum: Information Section (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-information-section) +--- Forum: Terrestrial Wild Animals (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-terrestrial-wild-animals) +--- Thread: Hunting success (/topic-hunting-success) |
Hunting success - Shadow - 08-20-2019 Thread to share information about success rates of predators and also what kind of information can be found behind percentages. This thread is meant for terrestrial predators. I start with observations and thoughts from Londolozi guide James Tyrrell. I found it interesting. Quote: "Are Leopards Successful Hunters? Most of what I’m about to type is purely anecdotal evidence. It comes from years of game drives and walks in the field, but given that A) we only witness less than 10% of a leopard’s daily routine (and that’s as a Londolozi team, rather than for an individual ranger or tracker), and B) I’m not running any statistical analyses on my personal observations, none of this is gospel, it’s merely the initiation of what I consider to be an interesting conservation stream. The established fact is that leopards don’t have a particularly high success rate in hunts. I’m sure the figure varies somewhat between areas, and maybe even between individual leopards, but as it’s roughly 20% – or maybe even less – I’ll agree that they don’t score well in the hunt-conversion ratio. Certainly not when you compare them to Wild Dogs, which are up above 70% in their hunting success rate. Of course the dogs have a different hunting strategy and they operate as a pack, so it’s like comparing apples and oranges, but I’m merely giving an appreciation for where these solitary spotted cats sit." *This image is copyright of its original author Whole story and more photos: https://blog.londolozi.com/2019/08/10/leopard-success-rates-in-the-stalk/ RE: Rainforest Leopards - Styx38 - 08-22-2019 @Shadow My reply is not exactly "Lion vs Cape Buffalo" It is more "Carnivores vs. Bovines" My main point was that Bovines are the most formidable opponents of any carnivore. The Lion-Buffalo relationship was just a better example. You can see how an adult Forest Buffalo is too dangerous for a Leopard (excluding the elephant calf-buffalo size comparison). Quote:Infact elephants may offer less risk of injury to the leopard than other prey of similar size (e.g. forest buffalo) (Ruggiero 1991a). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/249944124_Do_leopards_kill_forest_elephants_Evidence_from_northern_Congo Not only are Wild Bovids dangerous, they have also killed different carnivores in different ecosystems. Grizzlies killed by Bison: Quote:Young bison v. Grizzly sow ^ This was posted in another thread, but shows that a buffalo is too dangerous, and capable of killing a Grizzly Bear Tiger killed by Gaurs and Water Buffalos: Quote:Jorhat, Nov. 11: A Royal Bengal tiger carcass was found inside the Kaziranga National Park today, just a day after the recovery of another carcass. These posts are to show how powerful wild bovines are. This is why it is not surprising for a Leopard to usually avoid full grown Buffalo. RE: Rainforest Leopards - Shadow - 08-22-2019 (08-22-2019, 11:37 AM)Styx38 Wrote: @Shadow My reply is not exactly "Lion vs Cape Buffalo" It is one thing to say, that some prey is more difficult than other. Then another thing to say, that it would be too much. Predators take down all kind of prey and sometimes also the most dangerous there is. Of course when talking about gorillas, silverbacks aren´t the ones normally attacked. When talking about forest buffalos, calves and cows are preferred without a doubt. Still time to time we are lucky to see individuals, which show to us that "impossible" is possible. But that is well known thing, that life of the leopard, tiger, lion etc. isn´t easy and many pay heavy price for inexperience, bad luck etc. Still as many videos show, these predators make time to time high risk hunts. Sometimes succeeding, often prey is able to fight/flee and in some cases hunter is badly injured or die. That´s life for these animals. My point was just, that even though some animals are difficult to take down, that doesn´t mean same as impossible/off limits. One good thing to remember too is, that most hunts happen in darkness, giving better chance for hunter to get close to prey unnoticed. We see in videos only a fraction and in circumstances which are most difficult especially, when thinking about hunting alone. RE: Hunting success - Shadow - 08-22-2019 @ RE: Hunting success - Shadow - 12-03-2019 Deadliest cat.... not lion, not leopard.... nope, it´s the black-footed cat! Hunting success rate is very impressive for any cat, approximately 60% of hunts are successful. Something what bigger "cousins" can only dream on. https://www.livescience.com/63992-deadliest-cat.html So cute... and deadly *This image is copyright of its original author Quote:"In one night, a black-footed cat kills between 10 and 14 rodents or small birds, averaging a kill about every 50 minutes, according to Hunter. With a 60 percent success rate, black-footed cats are about three times as successful as lions, which average a successful kill about 20 to 25 percent of the time, Hunter said." RE: Hunting success - Shadow - 12-29-2019 This video is about tigers. Joseph Vattakaven (after 4 years observing) mentions, that tiger needs 25 stalks/successful kill. Then again that is only small part of this video, I would recommend to watch it, if a bit time. You don´t see too many times Valmik Thapar, Ullas Karanth and George Schaller on same video with of course Joseph Vattakaven. And Karanth, Schaller and Vattakaven at same time and same place discussing. A good video to "give faces" behind names printed on covers and pages of so many books. It´s kind of amazing to watch Shaller on this clip, when knowing how long time ago he started his career. |