WildFact
Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Printable Version

+- WildFact (https://wildfact.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Information Section (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-information-section)
+--- Forum: Terrestrial Wild Animals (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-terrestrial-wild-animals)
+---- Forum: Wild Cats (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-wild-cats)
+----- Forum: Lion (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-lion)
+----- Thread: Coalitions of Kruger National Park (/topic-coalitions-of-kruger-national-park)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Gijima - 12-05-2020

Berg en Dal, Nov 2018
Credit: Our Life in Kruger 


*This image is copyright of its original author



RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - titose - 12-05-2020

Watch the next generation "Lion Kings" of the Nwaswitsontso Pride in Kruger National Park.







RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Potato - 12-05-2020

Singita KNP update
  • The Shishangaan Pride has been seen frequently on the concession. They are in good condition and have been sighted with full bellies. One of the cubs who was previously struggling with mange, has now sustained additional injuries of unknown origin which has left it with a missing eye and injured/tattered ear, however, when sighted, the little cub has not let its condition get the better of him and was still managing to keep up with the rest of the pride.
  • The Mananga Pride has been maintaining their stronghold around the north-western parts of our concession, predominantly around Gudzane Dam. The two Shishangaan males were also seen with the Mananga Pride on a few occasions.
  • The Mountain Pride has also been seen on the property accompanied by Xihamham (Shish male) on a couple of those occasions.
  • An unknown coalition of two males were seen steadily heading in a northly direction around N’wanetsi through territories that have been actively defended by the likes of the Kumana male and Shishangaan males, leaving nothing but tracks as evidence of their presence.
  • Another unknown coalition of four adult male lions were seen feeding on a buffalo in the central parts of our concession.



RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - T I N O - 12-06-2020

The three Mopani males on the move at Letaba in the H14
Image credits: Kobus of Beer

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author



RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - T I N O - 12-06-2020


*This image is copyright of its original author

Beautiful male lion photographed today near Lower Sabie in the Kruger National Park
One of the two SLS/Tshokwane males
Photo credits: Ruan Minnaar
KNP-Lower Sabie-12.05.20


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 12-06-2020

(12-05-2020, 05:08 AM)BA0701 Wrote: First thing I thought of as soon as I saw the picture. Clearly there is something going on. I know that AIDS causes sores on people, not sure if it affects cats in the same way, I'm also not sure of the exact affects of TB in cats either, as it seems to affect them differently than it does people. This is all very troubling, to say the least.

Thats muscle eating TB.. As far as I understand, not all TB's are dangerous (same as cancer to humans).. This one is and occurs on back legs of lion (mosty after injury, its some kind of a trigger) and eats whole muscle to the point that even bones are visible, example of Sizanani:


*This image is copyright of its original author


Exact thing happened to Nsuku and prob Hip Scar Majingilane..

Buddy and DeLaporte Talamati prob have exact thing.. 

It seems that most males in Kruger has TB, but not all have this one which is dangerous..


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-06-2020

(12-06-2020, 02:21 AM)Tr1x24 Wrote:
(12-05-2020, 05:08 AM)BA0701 Wrote: First thing I thought of as soon as I saw the picture. Clearly there is something going on. I know that AIDS causes sores on people, not sure if it affects cats in the same way, I'm also not sure of the exact affects of TB in cats either, as it seems to affect them differently than it does people. This is all very troubling, to say the least.

Thats muscle eating TB.. As far as I understand, not all TB's are dangerous (same as cancer to humans).. This one is and occurs on back legs of lion (mosty after injury, its some kind of a trigger) and eats whole muscle to the point that even bones are visible, example of Sizanani:


*This image is copyright of its original author


Exact thing happened to Nsuku and prob Hip Scar Majingilane..

Buddy and DeLaporte Talamati prob have exact thing.. 

It seems that most males in Kruger has TB, but not all have this one which is dangerous..

I wish they were able to inoculate these animals. Not like there are so many that the losses in such numbers aren't detrimental to the species. Not to mention how heartbreaking it is watching them deteriorate in such a way.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Potato - 12-06-2020

" Not like there are so many that the losses in such numbers aren't detrimental to the species."

The lion population in the KNP is as healty as it can be. Moreover even one, single male without a competition can cover females even from multiple big prides so low amount of males bassicly never can be an issue. On the any dying pride or ageing male there are always few young males for which it is great opportunity. 

"Not to mention how heartbreaking it is watching them deteriorate in such a way."


You can not just think of pain of those dirrect lions, but also on consequences that helping lions brings up, like for example lifes of prey animals. Helping lion means also death sentence for a multiple species this lion would kill through his life and that is just a one of many issues helping lions would bring.  I am myself great supported of KNP's no intreferance policy. Of course it is sad to see lions we are following and getting attached to die, but unforturetly that is exactly how wildlife works. There are constantly some animals suffering and dying from various reasons like since or just being killed by another animal. The only way to cut such suffering would be to destroy wildlife and close up all the reserves, but would it be what should have been done. I definitelly do not think so. Seeing some lions in wildlife died is just rough reality we have to live with.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-06-2020

(12-06-2020, 03:02 AM)Potato Wrote: " Not like there are so many that the losses in such numbers aren't detrimental to the species."

The lion population in the KNP is as healty as it can be. Moreover even one, single male without a competition can cover females even from multiple big prides so low amount of males bassicly never can be an issue. On the any dying pride or ageing male there are always few young males for which it is great opportunity. 

"Not to mention how heartbreaking it is watching them deteriorate in such a way."


You can not just think of pain of those dirrect lions, but also on consequences that helping lions brings up, like for example lifes of prey animals. Helping lion means also death sentence for a multiple species this lion would kill through his life and that is just a one of many issues helping lions would bring.  I am myself great supported of KNP's no intreferance policy. Of course it is sad to see lions we are following and getting attached to die, but unforturetly that is exactly how wildlife works. There are constantly some animals suffering and dying from various reasons like since or just being killed by another animal. The only way to cut such suffering would be to destroy wildlife and close up all the reserves, but would it be what should have been done. I definitelly do not think so. Seeing some lions in wildlife died is just rough reality we have to live with.

Are you implying that the loss of an antelope or buffalo could have the same impact the loss of a lion would have? For starters the numbers of lions is but a small fraction of the numbers of the animals they prey upon. Just as we have seen with sea lions, whitetail deer, or any countless other examples, if the shark population decreases drastically the sea lion population increases beyond the capabilities of the surrounding food sources often leading to starving animals, or if certain areas minimize or eliminate hunting of whitetail deer, the numbers of these animals increases exponentially, and such increases have been proven to be detrimental to the area's population of the species as a whole. Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 12-06-2020

(12-06-2020, 03:02 AM)Potato Wrote: You can not just think of pain of those dirrect lions, but also on consequences that helping lions brings up, like for example lifes of prey animals. Helping lion means also death sentence for a multiple species this lion would kill through his life and that is just a one of many issues helping lions would bring.  I am myself great supported of KNP's no intreferance policy. Of course it is sad to see lions we are following and getting attached to die, but unforturetly that is exactly how wildlife works. There are constantly some animals suffering and dying from various reasons like since or just being killed by another animal. The only way to cut such suffering would be to destroy wildlife and close up all the reserves, but would it be what should have been done. I definitelly do not think so. Seeing some lions in wildlife died is just rough reality we have to live with.

Agree with @Potato on this one.. Its sad to see lions die of disease's and injuries.. But thats balance of nature... Saving lions in Kruger would prob trigger effect of lack of prey for them in long run, which would mean more compatitions, starving and dying of lions..

Overpopulation of lions is not good because of that..

I think Mara has problem with that.. Too many lions in that area, young males cant get an chance, they get ousted from that area and roam into villages where they get killed by locals in search for prey..

Kruger is fine as it is..


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 12-06-2020

(12-06-2020, 03:50 AM)BA0701 Wrote: Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life.

Male lion will always get replaced by others.. And even if his cubs will get killed, new coalition will sire new ones.. Thats how it is..

Just look how many lions Majingilanes killed, but they sired more.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Potato - 12-06-2020

(12-06-2020, 03:59 AM)Tr1x24 Wrote:
(12-06-2020, 03:50 AM)BA0701 Wrote: Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life.

Male lion will always get replaced by others.. And even if his cubs will get killed, new coalition will sire new ones.. Thats how it is..

Just look how many lions Majingilanes killed, but they sired more.

I would also add to this that:

1. Gene poll gets better when new males switch old ones as a rulers of the pride. I fact he very rarely can see  inbreading in lions prides in Kruger.
2. In the long run younger males have better chance to live long enoght to carry protection for his cubs all thir way to adulthood.
3. Argument of a lost of single male leading to loss of many cubs works also in opposite way as this saved lion can kill cubs of other male from other pride.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-06-2020

(12-06-2020, 03:59 AM)Tr1x24 Wrote:
(12-06-2020, 03:50 AM)BA0701 Wrote: Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life.

Single lion will always get replaced by others.. And even if his cubs will get killed, new coalition will sire new ones.. Thats how it is..

Just look how many lions Majingilanes killed, but they sired more.

Using that example, the Majingilanes, and since we have not heard specific numbers claimed as we have with the 100 reportedly killed by the Mapogos, the Mapogos absolutely did not sire 100 cubs, and I somehow doubt that the Majingilanes "History's most brutal killers" sired more cubs than the numbers they killed as well. 

I was simply stating my personal desires, no more than so many others have recently stated in regards to the wish that someone had intervened with Junior. People are free to their own opinions, and if those opinions differ from mine that is perfectly fine and acceptable. However, to imply that the act of prolonging a lion's life will have the same negative impact on prey species, that the death of said lion will have on the lion population is simply not true. In fact, the deaths of too many lions will have a greater negative impact on prey species due to the increase in those populations and the inability for the surrounding lands to maintain proper levels of food sources for them. That has been shown to lead to starvation and disease. The effects of a lions death reverberates through the surrounding areas, and to the lion population in general, whereas the death of an antelope or buffalo is not nearly as consequential to that species as a whole. To desire nature to carry on as it always has with no human involvement, is a perfectly acceptable and justifiable opinion to have, but to use the negligible impact that prolonging that lions life on the surrounding prey species is off the mark in my opinion.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-06-2020

(12-06-2020, 04:17 AM)Potato Wrote:
(12-06-2020, 03:59 AM)Tr1x24 Wrote:
(12-06-2020, 03:50 AM)BA0701 Wrote: Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life.

Male lion will always get replaced by others.. And even if his cubs will get killed, new coalition will sire new ones.. Thats how it is..

Just look how many lions Majingilanes killed, but they sired more.


"Argument of a lost of single male leading to loss of many cubs works also in opposite way as this saved lion can kill cubs of other male from other pride."

Good point


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Potato - 12-06-2020

"Are you implying that the loss of an antelope or buffalo could have the same impact the loss of a lion would have"

I am implying that other animals suffer, feel pain the same way lions do and I do not see reason why should I feel more compassion for the suffering lion than a suffering buffalo. What is the logic behind supporting lions and no any other animals?

" For starters the numbers of lions is but a small fraction of the numbers of the animals they prey upon. Just as we have seen with sea lions, whitetail deer, or any countless other examples, if the shark population decreases drastically the sea lion population increases beyond the capabilities of the surrounding food sources often leading to starving animals, or if certain areas minimize or eliminate hunting of whitetail deer, the numbers of these animals increases exponentially, and such increases have been proven to be detrimental to the area's population of the species as a whole."

That is exactly why we should leave nature to balance it self. Nature was balancing itself perfectly for a milions of years before humans appeared and will do perfectly fine in that regard without human. Human interventions can just broke it. 

"Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life."


Well... Kruger has already quite long history and you can see how the lion population is doing under it policy and that is perfectly healty.

"Using that example, the Majingilanes, and since we have not heard specific numbers claimed as we have with the 100 reportedly killed by the Mapogos, the Mapogos absolutely did not sire 100 cubs"

I do not understand what has that got to do with Kruger's policy. Such big, overpowered coalitions, killing what gets in their way will appear here and there from time to time no matter what policy Kruger would use.

" and I somehow doubt that the Majingilanes "History's most brutal killers" sired more cubs than the numbers they killed as well. "

I think they did. They did not killed that much cubs and sired cubs in 7 different prides.

"However, to imply that the act of prolonging a lion's life will have the same negative impact on prey species, that the death of said lion will have on the lion population is simply not true. In fact, the deaths of too many lions will have a greater negative impact on prey species due to the increase in those populations and the inability for the surrounding lands to maintain proper levels of food sources for them. That has been shown to lead to starvation and disease. The effects of a lions death reverberates through the surrounding areas, and to the lion population in general, whereas the death of an antelope or buffalo is not nearly as consequential to that species as a whole."

Through Magopo era 60% of lion population in Sabi Sands disappeared and what came out of it? Nature will balance itself perfectly fine and human involvement can only cause problems.