Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Printable Version +- WildFact (https://wildfact.com/forum) +-- Forum: Information Section (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-information-section) +--- Forum: Terrestrial Wild Animals (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-terrestrial-wild-animals) +---- Forum: Wild Cats (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-wild-cats) +----- Forum: Lion (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-lion) +----- Thread: Coalitions of Kruger National Park (/topic-coalitions-of-kruger-national-park) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
786
787
788
|
RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Gijima - 12-05-2020 Berg en Dal, Nov 2018 Credit: Our Life in Kruger *This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - titose - 12-05-2020 Watch the next generation "Lion Kings" of the Nwaswitsontso Pride in Kruger National Park. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Potato - 12-05-2020 Singita KNP update
RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - T I N O - 12-06-2020 The three Mopani males on the move at Letaba in the H14 Image credits: Kobus of Beer *This image is copyright of its original author *This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - T I N O - 12-06-2020 *This image is copyright of its original author Beautiful male lion photographed today near Lower Sabie in the Kruger National Park One of the two SLS/Tshokwane males Photo credits: Ruan Minnaar KNP-Lower Sabie-12.05.20 RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 12-06-2020 (12-05-2020, 05:08 AM)BA0701 Wrote: First thing I thought of as soon as I saw the picture. Clearly there is something going on. I know that AIDS causes sores on people, not sure if it affects cats in the same way, I'm also not sure of the exact affects of TB in cats either, as it seems to affect them differently than it does people. This is all very troubling, to say the least. Thats muscle eating TB.. As far as I understand, not all TB's are dangerous (same as cancer to humans).. This one is and occurs on back legs of lion (mosty after injury, its some kind of a trigger) and eats whole muscle to the point that even bones are visible, example of Sizanani: *This image is copyright of its original author Exact thing happened to Nsuku and prob Hip Scar Majingilane.. Buddy and DeLaporte Talamati prob have exact thing.. It seems that most males in Kruger has TB, but not all have this one which is dangerous.. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-06-2020 (12-06-2020, 02:21 AM)Tr1x24 Wrote:(12-05-2020, 05:08 AM)BA0701 Wrote: First thing I thought of as soon as I saw the picture. Clearly there is something going on. I know that AIDS causes sores on people, not sure if it affects cats in the same way, I'm also not sure of the exact affects of TB in cats either, as it seems to affect them differently than it does people. This is all very troubling, to say the least. I wish they were able to inoculate these animals. Not like there are so many that the losses in such numbers aren't detrimental to the species. Not to mention how heartbreaking it is watching them deteriorate in such a way. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Potato - 12-06-2020 " Not like there are so many that the losses in such numbers aren't detrimental to the species." The lion population in the KNP is as healty as it can be. Moreover even one, single male without a competition can cover females even from multiple big prides so low amount of males bassicly never can be an issue. On the any dying pride or ageing male there are always few young males for which it is great opportunity. "Not to mention how heartbreaking it is watching them deteriorate in such a way." You can not just think of pain of those dirrect lions, but also on consequences that helping lions brings up, like for example lifes of prey animals. Helping lion means also death sentence for a multiple species this lion would kill through his life and that is just a one of many issues helping lions would bring. I am myself great supported of KNP's no intreferance policy. Of course it is sad to see lions we are following and getting attached to die, but unforturetly that is exactly how wildlife works. There are constantly some animals suffering and dying from various reasons like since or just being killed by another animal. The only way to cut such suffering would be to destroy wildlife and close up all the reserves, but would it be what should have been done. I definitelly do not think so. Seeing some lions in wildlife died is just rough reality we have to live with. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-06-2020 (12-06-2020, 03:02 AM)Potato Wrote: " Not like there are so many that the losses in such numbers aren't detrimental to the species." Are you implying that the loss of an antelope or buffalo could have the same impact the loss of a lion would have? For starters the numbers of lions is but a small fraction of the numbers of the animals they prey upon. Just as we have seen with sea lions, whitetail deer, or any countless other examples, if the shark population decreases drastically the sea lion population increases beyond the capabilities of the surrounding food sources often leading to starving animals, or if certain areas minimize or eliminate hunting of whitetail deer, the numbers of these animals increases exponentially, and such increases have been proven to be detrimental to the area's population of the species as a whole. Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 12-06-2020 (12-06-2020, 03:02 AM)Potato Wrote: You can not just think of pain of those dirrect lions, but also on consequences that helping lions brings up, like for example lifes of prey animals. Helping lion means also death sentence for a multiple species this lion would kill through his life and that is just a one of many issues helping lions would bring. I am myself great supported of KNP's no intreferance policy. Of course it is sad to see lions we are following and getting attached to die, but unforturetly that is exactly how wildlife works. There are constantly some animals suffering and dying from various reasons like since or just being killed by another animal. The only way to cut such suffering would be to destroy wildlife and close up all the reserves, but would it be what should have been done. I definitelly do not think so. Seeing some lions in wildlife died is just rough reality we have to live with. Agree with @Potato on this one.. Its sad to see lions die of disease's and injuries.. But thats balance of nature... Saving lions in Kruger would prob trigger effect of lack of prey for them in long run, which would mean more compatitions, starving and dying of lions.. Overpopulation of lions is not good because of that.. I think Mara has problem with that.. Too many lions in that area, young males cant get an chance, they get ousted from that area and roam into villages where they get killed by locals in search for prey.. Kruger is fine as it is.. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 12-06-2020 (12-06-2020, 03:50 AM)BA0701 Wrote: Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life. Male lion will always get replaced by others.. And even if his cubs will get killed, new coalition will sire new ones.. Thats how it is.. Just look how many lions Majingilanes killed, but they sired more. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Potato - 12-06-2020 (12-06-2020, 03:59 AM)Tr1x24 Wrote:(12-06-2020, 03:50 AM)BA0701 Wrote: Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life. I would also add to this that: 1. Gene poll gets better when new males switch old ones as a rulers of the pride. I fact he very rarely can see inbreading in lions prides in Kruger. 2. In the long run younger males have better chance to live long enoght to carry protection for his cubs all thir way to adulthood. 3. Argument of a lost of single male leading to loss of many cubs works also in opposite way as this saved lion can kill cubs of other male from other pride. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-06-2020 (12-06-2020, 03:59 AM)Tr1x24 Wrote:(12-06-2020, 03:50 AM)BA0701 Wrote: Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life. Using that example, the Majingilanes, and since we have not heard specific numbers claimed as we have with the 100 reportedly killed by the Mapogos, the Mapogos absolutely did not sire 100 cubs, and I somehow doubt that the Majingilanes "History's most brutal killers" sired more cubs than the numbers they killed as well. I was simply stating my personal desires, no more than so many others have recently stated in regards to the wish that someone had intervened with Junior. People are free to their own opinions, and if those opinions differ from mine that is perfectly fine and acceptable. However, to imply that the act of prolonging a lion's life will have the same negative impact on prey species, that the death of said lion will have on the lion population is simply not true. In fact, the deaths of too many lions will have a greater negative impact on prey species due to the increase in those populations and the inability for the surrounding lands to maintain proper levels of food sources for them. That has been shown to lead to starvation and disease. The effects of a lions death reverberates through the surrounding areas, and to the lion population in general, whereas the death of an antelope or buffalo is not nearly as consequential to that species as a whole. To desire nature to carry on as it always has with no human involvement, is a perfectly acceptable and justifiable opinion to have, but to use the negligible impact that prolonging that lions life on the surrounding prey species is off the mark in my opinion. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-06-2020 (12-06-2020, 04:17 AM)Potato Wrote:(12-06-2020, 03:59 AM)Tr1x24 Wrote:(12-06-2020, 03:50 AM)BA0701 Wrote: Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life. Good point RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Potato - 12-06-2020 "Are you implying that the loss of an antelope or buffalo could have the same impact the loss of a lion would have" I am implying that other animals suffer, feel pain the same way lions do and I do not see reason why should I feel more compassion for the suffering lion than a suffering buffalo. What is the logic behind supporting lions and no any other animals? " For starters the numbers of lions is but a small fraction of the numbers of the animals they prey upon. Just as we have seen with sea lions, whitetail deer, or any countless other examples, if the shark population decreases drastically the sea lion population increases beyond the capabilities of the surrounding food sources often leading to starving animals, or if certain areas minimize or eliminate hunting of whitetail deer, the numbers of these animals increases exponentially, and such increases have been proven to be detrimental to the area's population of the species as a whole." That is exactly why we should leave nature to balance it self. Nature was balancing itself perfectly for a milions of years before humans appeared and will do perfectly fine in that regard without human. Human interventions can just broke it. "Whereas the loss of a single male lion can quite directly lead to the loss of many cubs and even some lionesses, and given the much smaller numbers of the lions this could have a much more detrimental impact on so many others in the surrounding areas. Comparing the two is quite simply apples and oranges. The loss of a single lion is far more consequential than the prey he may take as a result of prolonging his life." Well... Kruger has already quite long history and you can see how the lion population is doing under it policy and that is perfectly healty. "Using that example, the Majingilanes, and since we have not heard specific numbers claimed as we have with the 100 reportedly killed by the Mapogos, the Mapogos absolutely did not sire 100 cubs" I do not understand what has that got to do with Kruger's policy. Such big, overpowered coalitions, killing what gets in their way will appear here and there from time to time no matter what policy Kruger would use. " and I somehow doubt that the Majingilanes "History's most brutal killers" sired more cubs than the numbers they killed as well. " I think they did. They did not killed that much cubs and sired cubs in 7 different prides. "However, to imply that the act of prolonging a lion's life will have the same negative impact on prey species, that the death of said lion will have on the lion population is simply not true. In fact, the deaths of too many lions will have a greater negative impact on prey species due to the increase in those populations and the inability for the surrounding lands to maintain proper levels of food sources for them. That has been shown to lead to starvation and disease. The effects of a lions death reverberates through the surrounding areas, and to the lion population in general, whereas the death of an antelope or buffalo is not nearly as consequential to that species as a whole." Through Magopo era 60% of lion population in Sabi Sands disappeared and what came out of it? Nature will balance itself perfectly fine and human involvement can only cause problems. |