Size comparisons

[Shadow]

(12-06-2020, 04:29 AM)TinoArmando Wrote: Yes, I'm very agreed with the comparison of him. I was meaning about lion sizes, The Kgalagadi lions, Are well-known for being one of the  biggest of all.

Yeah, but scaling only shoulder height with random photos leads to distortions. If you look at posting of @"Khan85" head and body measurements of those lions were approximately 20% shorter in comparison of tiger photo. I don´t think that difference is that big. Usually male lions and tigers have head-body length around 2 meters and difference not more than 10% if at all depending of which populations/subspecies are compared.

Also @OrcaDaBest seems to have been sharing odd looking size comparisons what comes to tigers and lions and then Kodiak and polar bears.

I would recommend, that if not using authentic photos with two animals close to each others, then scaling should be done properly so, that body dimensions are based on some figures (height and length), which are told and can be seen. @GuateGojira has some excellent examples. Reply