Can legalised-hunting help conservation?

[Pckts]

@sanjay

"Let’s talk about John Varty (JV) and let’s put aside the debate what he is doing is wrong or right.
He has made lot of expense to make tiger secure growing and spreading in tiger canyon, Now since tiger is increasing he needs more land, Do you think the money he is getting from tourism will help to acquire him more lands? Obviously No."

John Varty is not the person who collects money, he is backed by private investors. All the of the money received goes directly to them, they decide what to pay varty and if its worth it to buy more land.
They care nothing of conservation since the land is privately owned, the animals are inbred and hybrids which offer no conservational purpose, people are allowed to hunt them, tran'q them or pet the cubs for the right price.

If Varty cared about conservation, he would go donate all of his money and time to educating the public, doing studies and being a voice for the animals.
Take a look at Packer, he speaks at schools, spends his life with Lions, contributed more ecological information than arguably any other Big cat expert in history, he doesn't do it for the money, he does it for the love of those creatures. I agree 100% that conservation is a low paying job, but thats why the people who do it are so pure in their ideals. Varty and Salmoni took the easy way out, zoo owners and circus owners use these creatures for financial gain, not conservation.
I wish that countries gave huge sums of money to wild life protection and conservation, but until gov't isn't ran by huge corporations who pay big bucks to make sure their products are produced, it will not happen. Reply