Felines Hunting

[Pckts]

(09-09-2014, 02:08 AM)'chaos' Wrote:

(09-08-2014, 11:52 PM)'Pckts' Wrote:

(09-08-2014, 11:12 PM)'chaos' Wrote:

(09-08-2014, 10:53 PM)'Pckts' Wrote:

(09-08-2014, 07:02 PM)'chaos' Wrote:

(09-08-2014, 05:51 AM)'Pantherinae' Wrote: I don't think it happens Because they would lose such a large prey to other carnivores, and why hunt adult zebra in Africa when there is so much easier prey! 

Well it's not that I don't belive Christine, but I do also belive Almero who is a ecooligist and said he and a vertrenarian weighed The specimen, aswell as The people at Timbawati said it was weighed and that Christine had Nothing to do with this lion, probably different Lions.. And also what has that to do with old storries? Who has suddenly stoped happening.. 

 






 

You are correct. For the last time on this, they were seperate incidents. Christinas account
happened earlier when still with the project. The cat  weighed happened after Christine left
Both accounts are believable. That simple 

 





 

Wow, the only lion that was weighed with a date attached, images shown, documented and proven was on Oct. 24.
That is the only lion that is used, if they captured the SAME lion at a later date, we would need to see the date of capture, the lion image shown, the scale used and the measurements of the "alleged" lion.
All of which do not exist.
One has actual proof, the other is nothing more than hearsay.

 




 

You're calling Mr Bosch, whom you've never met nor had any interaction with, a flat out liar?



 

You're calling Christina who you never met or had any interaction with, a flat out liar?

See how that works?

I am asking for Proof. Like what is provided from christina's end.
If you bosch is telling the truth, then lets see measurements, scale used, images, you know, PROOF!
Weird how you'll readily accept his word and not Christinas. The rules are the same, claims must be backing by evidence or they are meaningless.
 


 

Do you understand anything? Time and again, be it any topic, you miss the bus. Its right here in this thread,
on this very page. I stated - clearly - both accounts are believable.

 

"I stated - clearly - both accounts are believable."
Nobody cares what you have stated, your opinion means nothing.
Nothing posted states one lion to be different than the other, no measurements, capture dates, etc.

Between you and me, one of us actually contributes the other chimes in with the same BS every time.
Prove the lions are different, show me capture images, dates, witnesses and verified personal who were there. If not, be quite.

Stop derailing the thread with your bias nonsense, if you want to continue this debate, feel free to post new evidence in the "largest living lions" thread. Reply