The Lion King 2019

[Panther]

(01-14-2019, 10:56 AM)GuateGojira Wrote: I think that the animals of Disney are better than those from Warner, they are more realistic. However, the story of Warner is much better than that of Disney, is more ground up, I think.

However, while I prefer the face of the tiger of Disney, the body and specially the limping defect of the Warner tiger is the one from the original book, after all, Shere Khan was not a real tiger "king", it was a nasty and relativelly weak tiger. However, the Shere Khan of Disney is a real "king", an incredible killing machine (defeated a big brown bear, a big leopard and a pack of gray wolves!), that will no need to kill cattle and by no means will have the need to kill humans.

Even then, I have a like for the Baloo and Baghera of Warner, some how, I think that the story of Baghera of Warner is very interesting.

The two movies are great, but one is more drive to kids and families and the other for grown up people, I think.

Yeah, maybe story part of warner is of course a little better and realistic. But for animation, even for baloo and bagheera Disney's one is better for me! 

The problem is, they put old human facials for the animals like baloo and bagheera. But even in real world, old animal doesn't look like that, but like baloo and bagheera from Disney! Reply