Tigers of Central India

[Tshokwane]

(07-19-2016, 08:32 PM)Roflcopters Wrote: Kingfisher male's size is far greater than any Mukki male out there and this cant be contested. when Mundi dadar male was around (Kingfisher's father) he ran Munna out of his territory, had a litter that he guarded for about an year and then he mysteriously vanished after that. (Kingfisher is from the same litter) 

Kf defeated Umarpani in jan 2015 and after that they had numerous fights, at the end. neither of them were willing to give up Mukki. same case with Bheema and Link 7, numerous fights between the two but neither of these two were willing to give up. Bheema and Umarpani also had few fights and there was no winner at the end, like i once said. they are fighting to survive and fighting for space,  not to kill each other and Kf/Umarpani are the main reason for Thin Stripe vanishing for good. Kf has been around since mid 2014 and towards the end of 2014, he became a dominant force. since then and now. hes still in Mukki, along with Umarpani, Link 7, Bheema and the saga continues.

@Pckts @Roflcopters @Apollo

Why do you think there is such marked contrast between both stances?

For example, I see that you clearly favour the Kingfisher male, while others are more drawn to Bheema and Umarpani, almost marking off Kingfisher as little more than "fat"(Frankly, I see their point).

So why is it?. Is it just a personal opinion? Or is there evidence to say, "this male is superior" or "these two are the most dominant"?

I'm asking in this straight manner because, honestly, I do the same when analizing rival coalitions or rival dominant leopards, so I want to gain a bit more knowledge in the case of the Tigers. Reply