There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
(12-17-2016, 02:47 AM)Pckts Wrote: The lion for one.
Essay? It's not that long of a read and you can always skip to the results. Measuring a zoo cat is also misleading since there are variances between captive and wild skulls same with muscle mass.
Are you expecting lower or higher psi for lions?? As a semi scavenger in African savanna it is more than enough for lions.
Zoo animals findings are more reliable than fiber in any day.BTW did you read the report? in the report no Panthera Leo and no Panthera Tigris Tigris or Panthera Tigris Altica are measured.
*This image is copyright of its original author
What a stupid answer ! About the african lions:
1) false assertion: the scavengers have often, if not always, the strongest bites.
2) what you think is not an approved scientific fact. Only a biased opinion.
Yeah they're both going to have a similar bite force considering their head size. Its also not just about the bite hold, but how you bite, lions are better biters with their jaws then tigers. A lion can bite in multiple places before you even know what happened, and then hes gone. If the tigers going for that bite, its going to clutch and try to hold on usually, the lion will bite in so many different ways in so many different places stepping back from the opponent to protect itself and then going back in. You see this with gang ups, each lion takes its turn going in for a bite then ripping and shaking the head to inflict more damage, then they jump back.