|
Size comparisons
|
 *This image is copyright of its original author North Americas biggest bad lads (Tyrannosaurus vs Acrocanthosaurus diagrams by Franoys 
American mastodon vs Mapusaurus, skeletals by Larramendi and Franoys respectively.
On top is average vs average, with AMNH 9950 for the mastodon and MCF-PVPH-108.202 for Mapusaurus. The mastodon is 2.89 meters shoulder height and 7.8 tonnes, while the Mapusaurus is 12.23 meters axial length and 7 tonnes. On the bottom is max vs max, with 595BS71 for the mastodon and MCF-PVPH-108.145 for Mapusaurus. The mastodon is 3.25 meters shoulder height and 11 tonnes, while the Mapusaurus is 13.36 meters axial length and 8.5 tonnes. The scalebars for average vs average are fine to use but I suggest ignoring max vs max scalebars as I scaled up the animals and the scalebars wouldn't match what I scaled to. The size charts are not to scale with one another.
Sarkastodon vs Giganotosaurus, skeletals by blaze and Hartman respectively.
AMNH 26641 vs MUCPv-95
Sarkastodon vs Triceratops, max vs max, AMNH 26641 vs UCMP 128561. Skeletal credit goes to blaze and Hartman respectively.
The Sarkastodon is about 200 kg, while the Triceratops is probably around ~14-14.7 tonnes scaling up from BYU 12183 (GDI by SpinoInWonderland) 
Female puma against a guanaco about 3 times her weight: https://wildfact.com/forum/topic-camels-...8#pid94838
Southern mammoth (Scoppito specimen, ~4 meters shoulder height, 10.7 tonnes) vs Jimbo the Supersaurus (~33 meters TL, 35 tonnes)
Credit to Larramendi and Hartman for the skeletals, scalebar is 1 meter Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50/size-comparison-scale?page=86#ixzz65ou01nhR  *This image is copyright of its original author
Yes, that's what I do. However, I upload them to The World of Animals before screenshotting and uploading to Imgur, and ProBoards doesn't seem to allow for image cropping.
Oh well. Let's see what I can find.
This may have been posted already but I don't think it was.
Eotriceratops (lower estimate) vs Futalognkosaurus, skeletals by GetAwayTrike and Hartman respectively. Eotriceratops is probably ~10-12 tonnes while Futalognkosaurus is at least 50 tonnes http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/t...50?page=84
FMNH PR 2081 (Sue the Tyrannosaurus rex, around or somewhat above 8 tonnes) vs BYU 9024 (Barosaurus, 100 tonnes). Skeletals by Hartman
http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/t...50?page=84
Triceratops vs Mapusaurus, average vs average on top and max vs max on the bottom. Note: The charts are not to scale with each other and I suggest ignoring the scalebar in max vs max
On top is BYU 12183 (10.5-11 tonnes, scaled to 2.5 meter skull) vs MCF-PVPH-108.202 (7 tonnes, scaled to 148 cm skull) On the bottom is UCMP 128561 (14-14.7 tonnes, scaled to 2.7 meter skull) vs MCF-PVPH-108.145 (8.5 tonnes, scaled to 161 cm skull) Credit to Hartman for Trike and Franoys for Mapu http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50  *This image is copyright of its original author
Tyrannosaurus rex specimen Sue 12.3 meters and 9.7 tons with the Giganotosaurus holotype specimen 12.2 meters 7.5 tons diagrams by Franoys https://www.deviantart.com/franoys
*This image is copyright of its original author
Giganotosaurus specimen MUCP-V95 estimated size with Tyrannosaurus rex Sue
note: the size for Giganotosaurus here is based solely from one jaw fragment and nothing else. Many within the paleo community refuse to use this jaw fragment because it is unreliable for scaling. *This image is copyright of its original author *This image is copyright of its original author Diagrams from Scott Hartman *This image is copyright of its original author
|
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 6 Guest(s) |