Male tiger ustaad T-24 killed forest gaurd in Ranthambore

[Pckts]

SVTIGRIS Wrote: @Pckts that may have been the case but honestly it seemed really centered towards the guard and the national park themselves. The opinions of those commenting were not fully developed (or it did not seem that way) as the false hope of leaving them and letting the situation of population decline resolve itself was a pattern in the posts. I think when you start making decisions and opinions on raw emotions that is not the right way to go about a situation. Take Cecil. Hunting in Zimbabwe was banned but almost in no time it was allowed once again as it just wasn't sustainable (or at least that is what I remeber of the situation). We have to play a part in saving them, more than we did in destroying them in the first place.


I agree for the most part, especially with this part "when you start making decisions and opinions on raw emotions that is not the right way to go about a situation."
And that is where I think a lot of people had a problem. They may feel like Ustads "sentencing" was based on that, Raw emotion aka Fear. But I have come around a bit, I know that there will never be an absolute compromise but if Ustads life means that the tiger population as a whole will continue to grow and garner protection than so be it. I wish it wasn't the case since I firmly believe that no animal life is worth more or less than a human life but unfortunately most people don't share that sentiment. Reply