Eyes on or hands on? A discussion of human interference

[GuateGojira]

None of these copy-paste articles say anything about the study of the behavior of the animals. The camera traps are good, I have say it several times, but they are used to estimate density of animals, to get an idea if “x” animal is living in a “y” place or if it still alive, and with look, some of those cameras capture a few glimpses of animal behavior.
 
The problem here is that although the cameras can be used to monitor populations, they are unable to record the animal behavior in the long therm.
 
Your own post says it, “cameras are used to monitor and protect animals”, but they are useless, yet, to understand the behavior of these animals.
 
Finally, your own post also shows the use of radiocollars in the studies:

*This image is copyright of its original author

 
Both methods are useful, that is a real holistic study, but I simply can’t understand that hate for the radiocollars from you.
 
In your point of view, animals must be protected and leave them alone. However, this ignores the fact that to protect these animals in the long term, with the growing human population, we most know the behavior and needs of these animals. Sadly, you have chosen to ignore this.
  Reply