There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
--- Peter Broekhuijsen ---

  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Bear and bigcats anatomy

Venezuela epaiva Offline
Moderator
*****
Moderators

Liger skull it looks a lot like a Tger skull.
@GrizzlyClaws how do their upper fangs compare to the Tigers in size?
Credit to @oddarticulations

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author
6 users Like epaiva's post
Reply

parvez Offline
Tiger enthusiast
*****

The canines are pinkish. May be indicative of hybrid if I am right.
1 user Likes parvez's post
Reply

United States GrizzlyClaws Offline
Canine Expert
*****
Moderators
( This post was last modified: 08-07-2019, 09:33 PM by GrizzlyClaws )

(08-05-2019, 12:55 AM)epaiva Wrote: Liger skull it looks a lot like a Tger skull.
@GrizzlyClaws how do their upper fangs compare to the Tigers in size?
Credit to @oddarticulations

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author


Largest 16.8 cm tiger upper fang compared to a 14 cm liger upper fang (resin replica) extracted from a 43 cm liger skull (resin replica).



*This image is copyright of its original author





The liger upper fang from @oddarticulations is a real one albeit smaller at 12.9 cm. The liger skull size is 41 cm.



*This image is copyright of its original author
3 users Like GrizzlyClaws's post
Reply

Venezuela epaiva Offline
Moderator
*****
Moderators

(08-06-2019, 01:06 AM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote:
(08-05-2019, 12:55 AM)epaiva Wrote: Liger skull it looks a lot like a Tger skull.
@GrizzlyClaws how do their upper fangs compare to the Tigers in size?
Credit to @oddarticulations

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author


Largest 16.8 cm tiger upper fang compared to a 14 cm liger upper fang (resin replica) extracted from a 43 cm liger skull (resin replica).



*This image is copyright of its original author





The liger upper fang from oddarticulation is a real one albeit smaller at 12.9 cm. The liger skull size is 41 cm.



*This image is copyright of its original author
@GrizzlyClaws
Thanks a lot
1 user Likes epaiva's post
Reply

Malaysia johnny rex Offline
Wildanimal Enthusiast
***

(08-05-2019, 12:55 AM)epaiva Wrote: Liger skull it looks a lot like a Tger skull.
@GrizzlyClaws how do their upper fangs compare to the Tigers in size?
Credit to @oddarticulations

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

According to @oddarticulations, this liger skull is only 13+ inches in length and 8+ inches in width. Same size as average male lion or male tiger skull.
2 users Like johnny rex's post
Reply

Finland Shadow Offline
Contributor
*****

In this documentary they say, what I have always thought, 17:02-17:20.




3 users Like Shadow's post
Reply

RakeshMondal Offline
Member
**

(08-10-2019, 02:17 PM)Shadow Wrote: In this documentary they say, what I have always thought, 17:02-17:20.





I didn't know that was Dawkins documentary? Dawkins is my hero.
Reply

Finland Shadow Offline
Contributor
*****
( This post was last modified: 08-12-2019, 10:06 AM by Shadow )

(08-12-2019, 07:56 AM)RakeshMondal Wrote:
(08-10-2019, 02:17 PM)Shadow Wrote: In this documentary they say, what I have always thought, 17:02-17:20.





I didn't know that was Dawkins documentary? Dawkins is my hero.

Just google search with name of that documentary and more information can be found easily.
Reply

alexandro Offline
New Member
*
( This post was last modified: 01-08-2022, 05:40 AM by alexandro )

After researching the physiology and anatomical composition of animals, I find that the most muscular mammals are the wild felines.

It is not possible to make comparisons between them, the felines, due to the differences in dissection methods, especially with respect to the extraction of body fat.

This is in reference to the two scientific papers from which these data are taken: Davis (1962) cited in Munro (1969) and Pitts and Bullard (1969).

Lions, possess a mean musculature of 58.8 % without including body fat in the total body weight (Davis 1962), and 57.1 % (Mentioned in (Cuff et. al. 2017)), including the "excessive fat" that one of the specimens had (Something that the original author mentioned).

Bobcats and Canada lynx, had a muscle percentage of 58.5 and 56.5 % respectively including fat, but 66.5 and 66.1 % of fat-free body weight (Pitts and Bullard 1969).

Lions, even with the percentage of muscle including fat (57.1 %), would possess a greater musculature than any mammal according to Munro (1969) who compared the relative musculature of various mammals, including lions (with the figure of 58.8 % not including body fat).

Bobcats and lynx had the highest percentages of musculature, after two species of squirrels, the eastern gray squirrel Sciurus carolinensis and red squirrels Tamiasciurus hudsonicus, which possessed percentages of 61.4 and 59.2 % respectively (this taking into account fat as one of the body elements). But squirrels had unusually low amounts of body fat, compared to felids, and things change when body fat is not taken into account as an element of total body weight. Eastern gray squirrels and red squirrels possess relative musculature of 62.8 and 61.5 % of total fat-free body weight, respectively. Lower values compared to bobcats and Canada lynx under the same situation, which amount to 66.5 and 66.1 % respectively.

The image is my creation and the sources are cited, and the copyright of the images are also cited.

Translated with http://www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version).

*I not speak english.


Sources:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1962.tb03240.x
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1962.tb03240.x
https://www.nap.edu/read/20255/chapter/3#45
https://palaeo-electronica.org/content/2017/1857-reconstructing-a-fossil-lion
https://books.google.es/books?id=FDHLBAAAQBAJ&lpg=PA133&lr&hl=es&pg=PA154#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://books.google.es/books?id=-iBS6-2OO3wC&lpg=PR5&dq=Size%2C%20function%2C%20and%20life%20history&lr&hl=es&pg=PA19#v=onepage&q&f=false
https://brainevo.sitehost.iu.edu/publications/schoenemann.BBE.04.pdf
http://www.pinniped.net/muchlinski2012.pdf


*This image is copyright of its original author
1 user Likes alexandro's post
Reply






Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)

About Us
Go Social     Subscribe  

Welcome to WILDFACT forum, a website that focuses on sharing the joy that wildlife has on offer. We welcome all wildlife lovers to join us in sharing that joy. As a member you can share your research, knowledge and experience on animals with the community.
wildfact.com is intended to serve as an online resource for wildlife lovers of all skill levels from beginners to professionals and from all fields that belong to wildlife anyhow. Our focus area is wild animals from all over world. Content generated here will help showcase the work of wildlife experts and lovers to the world. We believe by the help of your informative article and content we will succeed to educate the world, how these beautiful animals are important to survival of all man kind.
Many thanks for visiting wildfact.com. We hope you will keep visiting wildfact regularly and will refer other members who have passion for wildlife.

Forum software by © MyBB