Tiger Directory

[Apollo]

(08-13-2014, 07:38 PM)'GuateGojira' Wrote: No Apollo, I have not used those tigers:
1. The only adult male was "over 200 kg", which means that we don't have a real weight. As far we know, he could weight no less than 220 kg!
2. The other male was a subadult.
3. There is only one adult female, so, I don't know were to include her.

There are some records from huge males from Gwalior (hunted), which is in the vicinity of Ranthambore and a few kilometers over Sariska. I think that I will include them with the modern male of 220 kg. The resulting average is impresive, this is all I can say for the moment.
 

 

Hi Guate,

In that article they have mentioned the tigers were measured and weighed, but unfortunately they didnt give off any measurements.
The male tiger weight was given ">200Kg" so I assumed they had a 200Kg scale and the tiger bottomed it, but Im not sure whether its a correct assumption.
If possible can you email them to get the measurements for these tigers and the weight issue.
I dont no why because whenever I email any experts I dont get any reply from them (May be my emails are not professional enough) [img]images/smilies/huh.gif[/img]
Is it possible for you to add the adult female weight into the table of female bengal weights..
What you think of starting a separate table for subadults ?

  Reply