Size comparisons

[JurassicDD]

(12-15-2019, 09:34 PM)DinoFan83 Wrote: Just a size comp. Chillax.

Anyhow, here's another good one:
BYU 12183 Triceratops (scaled to 2.5 meter skull length, 8.6 tonnes using this skeletal) and UCMP 128561 Triceratops (scaled to 2.7 meters skull length, 11 tonnes using this skeletal) vs Dreadnoughtus holotype (26 meters TL, 46 tonnes, still a juvenile). Scalebar is 1 meter, Triceratops skeletal is by Hartman while UCMP 128561's head is by Eofauna, Dreadnoughtus is by the paper describing it.

Read more: http://theworldofanimals.proboards.com/thread/50#ixzz68C67FUF0

*This image is copyright of its original author

It's just inaccurate information chillax
Stop trying to mislead people with your posts.

And why did you ignore my comments regarding you oversizing Mapusaurus ? is it because you don't like it ? its pretty simple lad the more you ignore me and the countless others that have told you non stop about the mistakes (that are clearly not mistakes at this point) you keep repeating the more I'm going to keep going correcting you.

I'm going to start posting a disclaimer on everything you post stating you have a reputation with inaccurate scaling and you tend to often use outdated information to suit your views and you have a bias regarding Tyrannosaurus this can all be backed up by either users on the world of animals or the Theropoda discord. Or you can listen to the countless people that have told you about the stuff you are purposely doing. Reply