B2 and Other Great Tiger Pics from India

[Pckts]

(03-22-2017, 12:06 AM)Pantherinae Wrote: I can't see the Uma v Bheema video, but several people have told me that Uma was bigger than Bheema, and I agree with @Pckts  Uma seems a "better" buildt tiger, they are really close in size and some says Uma and others say KF was the biggest. Maybe in weight KF was just as heavy maybe even heavier, but Uma imo is a much more impressive specimen, more solid while kingfisher is a fatter tiger, I think he was a serious cattle killer (if I remember correctly), so he probably was quite a lazy boy, but both are/ where magnificent and huge tigers.. So no point in arguing about their size we sadly will never know who weighed the most... But after hearing the weight of the smaller/ equal sized Bheema at the age of 2,5 years was 220 kg, we can only speculate how big their weight might be 260kg?, 280kg?, 300kg? Or maybe even more who knows...sad!

Any chance people have a place where I can see the Video of Bheema and Uma?

I lost track of the video unfortunately, I'm sure it will pop up again.
They must have weighed KF when he was treated for his nose injury, I wish we could get info on that.
I'd guess all are in the 230-272kg category, I'd also throw Kharai Ghati male and Prime Munna in that category as well but I heard that Kharai Ghati is thick but not as tall/long as the others mentioned. Even Link 7 looks bigger and bigger every time I see him.

@st147zar
Why don't you have a discussion like an adult, instead of calling me a "child" or "fanatic"
Considering the points I made and the images are with in the same vein. I guess you're calling any other eye witnesses who've seen both and agree, fanatic children as well?


http://naturesafariindia.com/blog/bigges...ral-india/

I'm not saying he's the bible but a guy with 28 years experience has a bit more credit, right? Reply