There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
(07-12-2014, 12:25 AM)'Pckts' Wrote: Don't be angry Gaute. Look at the good news, we will now have a new place to see wild Amur/Caspian Tigers.
The real question is how?
How can they bring back an extinct Tiger "allegedly"?
I am not angry with the reintroduction, I am angry with Wikipedia. The editors in the tiger section are a group of ignorant.
In one occasion I clearly show that male tigers in the wild are good fathers, that they even take care of they young, but the group of people there keep saying that male tigers "kill they sons". WHAT???? I keep posting data, but they even erased it, so I lost every trust in Wikipedia. Some articles are still in the original form, for example I was the one that created the section of "size" with the Bengal and Amur tigers, but at this time, someone have put his/her dirty hands on my sections, which is disgusting.
I will certainly NOT believe in Wikipedia, but many people DO, and that is what make me angry!!! [img]images/smilies/angry.gif[/img]
Thats why this forum is so great. People can try and quote wiki, then we say
"show me the data"
They respond "what?"
Then we show them actual measurements, sizes, weights, etc... Then hopefully they realize they are quoting nonsense, and begin to search on their own.
This doesn't happen often, but I do see it from time to time.
But either way, anybody using wiki as a source, is obviously not able to find actual info to back whatever their claims are. Or just not willing to search on their own.
The following 1 user Likes Pckts's post:1 user Likes Pckts's post • epaiva