There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
Tiger body mass underestimated in historical records
After reading numerous records, I noticed that many hunters have weighed there tigers in different ways. Some hunters have even weighed there tigers in small pieces. This causes a problem, cutting up and weighing an animal in small pieces causes the animal to loss its blood weight, resulting in a reduction in its mass. Keep in mind, blood alone makes up approximately ~7% of the body weight of an organism. Peter or Guate, what do you think?
Baker (1890) gives the weight of one tiger that we shot as 437 lbs, but he later took into account that the animal he shot have lost a significant amount of blood, estimated at 10 lbs.
*This image is copyright of its original author
Other hunters that have weighed tigers have not only shot there tigers causing them to bleed out before weighing, but have even cut there animal into small pieces...
Hornaday (1891) gives the weight of one tiger at 495 lbs, but there is a problem, check out how he weighed the tiger...
*This image is copyright of its original author
And as far as I've seen, he isn't the only one that did this. Thoughts?