Bigcats News

[Matias]

Although it is not possible to freely access the source of the information, I would venture to guess that formally there should be no evidence of a take-along partnership. They are very distant conceptions and not practical approach to conservation.

Sustainability is intrinsic to Namibian conservation, a reminder, along with South Africa, how much we need to expand and diversify conservation tools.

Namibia has a population that has not yet reached 3,000,000 million people while more than 1,000,000,000, without fences, live with wildlife. Who needs more encouragement, India or Namibia? 

Do not take this information into account. CITES meetings are filled with every comfort sustained by the Lobby of large animal rights organizations. Do not fear that Ivory or rhino horn will be commercially viable again. Take the case of South Africa, where more than half of the living rhinos are protected by the private sector, even without being able to finance this practice by the most profitable element that logic can suggest.

As long as wildlife conservation is solely a government responsibility, there is no risk of this trade resurfacing. Living off the crisis is a fabulous business.

Countries that don't have elephants, rhinos, lions... have a vote over those that do. It's where countries come together, in blocks of interests, to play with nations... their people, their assets, their landscapes. Reply