There is a world somewhere between reality and fiction. Although ignored by many, it is very real and so are those living in it. This forum is about the natural world. Here, wild animals will be heard and respected. The forum offers a glimpse into an unknown world as well as a room with a view on the present and the future. Anyone able to speak on behalf of those living in the emerald forest and the deep blue sea is invited to join.
(08-13-2014, 01:19 AM)'Siegfried' Wrote: A. Wagdoh has not been PROVEN to be larger than the average tiger
B. SOME lions are larger than average and CAN be larger than the average tiger.
C. "Boldchamp's assertions that perhaps some lions rival Wagdoh in size has not been proven with 100% certainty to be wrong."
Taking into consideration statements A and B, I still stand by statement C.
I didn't want to get off topic, but you seem to be forcing my hand.
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
Just a few eye witnesses confirming Waghdoh to be the biggest tiger they have ever seen. Wagdhoh is the furthest thing from "average" and this is confirmed time and time again. To not admit that and try and say that he could be average is a very unrealistic opinion from somebody that has never ever seen a wild tiger, let alone Waghdoh.
Just like the other eye witnesses confirming that Munna was the largest if not one of the largest tigers in Kahna. This are not "average", none are stated to be average and none are close to average when all of their images are shown.
Sorry, but your argument doesn't work here.
Overrated size of Munna aka Langda of Kanha National Park
