Overrated size of Munna aka Langda of Kanha National Park

[Roflcopters]

(07-19-2014, 11:22 PM)'Pckts' Wrote:

(07-19-2014, 08:56 PM)'Roflcopters' Wrote:

Quote:I appreciate your enthusiasm for tigers, but since this is a page dedicated to Kanha tigers, I don't wish to prolong the discussion, which is already off-topic. But re Ranthambore tigers, I'm sure the weight quoted for T-12 was incorrect, as T-18 was 170 kg when she was relocated, and she's about 1/2 the size of T-12 appearance-wise. A lot of people put irresponsible info on the internet and I can understand how you came across them. And I can point out to you one of the biggest sources of misinfo on tiger is a website called animalvsanimal.yuku.com where users constantly put in tiger photos without copyright acknowledgement and debate about individual tigers whom they know nothing about, like they know everything about them. Sites and people like that insult the tigers and are a disgrace IMO. In any case, no one knows about Ranthambore tigers better than Tiger trackers, who has documented just about all tigers of Ranth already and then some. If you have any question re Ranth tigers, including of T-18 and T-12, you can find tiger Trackers here:

looks like i pissed off Asianbuffalo's downsyndrome team of wannabe tiger experts, mission successful. 

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

*This image is copyright of its original author

Tigers of Kanha, who? LOL
 

"who's posting all this information", that's right "ME" .. LMAO sit down kid, I've posted more information about Tigers than you probably have pubes.

 

I already posted the kzt to waghdoh comments and the asianbuffalo comments, as well as comments from 5 other people. You can latch on to one person's comments all you want, it doesnt change the fact that there are 5 others from other people that say it as well.

I disagreed with you in regards to Patewala and Naak Male in which you originally said "munna was the largest tiger in Kahna" then you tried to claim them as larger, I posted numerous people, photos, videos and eye witness accounts that said you were wrong.

Lastly, don't be a moron. "LMAO sit down kid, I've posted more information about Tigers than you probably have pubes."
Notice once again, you are doing nothing more than acting like a child.
Stop getting defensive, I have said many times that you know way more about indian tigers than me, but it has nothing to do with weights, eye witness accounts, videos, pics etc...
You are not the only person that works with them, in fact you are unknown to us, your claims are no more genuine than any others, so stop being so sensitive and just have a actual conversation or don't, its up to you. But keep your moronic "pube" jokes to yourself, thanks.

And btw, Im using indiantigerwatch, tigertrackers, tigersofkahna, tigerwalah,kanwar and multiple other photogrophers eye witness accounts, safari sightings and personal experiences from them, video, photography etc..
You never are reasonable, you show jay with a female, waghdoh with a female, saturn and gabbar and katezari all looking very close in size and weight, all looking close to many of the claims posted, and you just neglect to discuss it. I post munna matching up every inch with jai or saturn with females, I have posted my conversations which I specifically state factually evidence of a tigers length being a better way to determine weight, usually, defending waghdohs size with evidence, etc. I'm being very reasonable here and I am certainly showing a ton of evidence that I have found!

 

lets hug [img]images/smilies/heart.gif[/img]
  Reply