WildFact
Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Printable Version

+- WildFact (https://wildfact.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Information Section (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-information-section)
+--- Forum: Terrestrial Wild Animals (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-terrestrial-wild-animals)
+---- Forum: Wild Cats (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-wild-cats)
+----- Forum: Lion (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-lion)
+----- Thread: Coalitions of Kruger National Park (/topic-coalitions-of-kruger-national-park)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583 584 585 586 587 588 589 590 591 592 593 594 595 596 597 598 599 600 601 602 603 604 605 606 607 608 609 610 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Mwk85 - 12-01-2022

New clips of the Trichard male. Last one shows he did sustain an injury from his encounter with the three males that chased him but appears to still be in good condition.

https://www.instagram.com/p/Cllw3phq2mg/?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Wyld@Heart - 12-01-2022

(11-30-2022, 05:23 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote: so you are saying that reason are humans who live near by? Not good prospect for future if reserve doesnt monitor that area more.

As well as the nature/human conflict, the Kruger north of the Olifants River changes dramatically in ecosystem. It's quite startling to be in open Maroela/Knobthorn Savanna South of the bridge and then pretty immediately encounter almost impenetrable Mopani veld as soon as you cross. Game densities north and far north are significantly less than south of Olifants resulting in fewer predators as well generally spread out over larger territories. The area around Letaba, for example, didn't have a resident pride in the area for years as well when I first started camping there. 

Pafuri concession is the area right at the northern tip of the Kruger and probably the best area in the Park for birding but has been lion sparse for a very long time. Lions victims to the human conflict does have an effect but the very nature of the ecosystem also plays it part.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-01-2022

(12-01-2022, 09:55 AM)Wyld@Heart Wrote:
(11-30-2022, 05:23 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote: so you are saying that reason are humans who live near by? Not good prospect for future if reserve doesnt monitor that area more.

As well as the nature/human conflict, the Kruger north of the Olifants River changes dramatically in ecosystem. It's quite startling to be in open Maroela/Knobthorn Savanna South of the bridge and then pretty immediately encounter almost impenetrable Mopani veld as soon as you cross. Game densities north and far north are significantly less than south of Olifants resulting in fewer predators as well generally spread out over larger territories. The area around Letaba, for example, didn't have a resident pride in the area for years as well when I first started camping there. 

Pafuri concession is the area right at the northern tip of the Kruger and probably the best area in the Park for birding but has been lion sparse for a very long time. Lions victims to the human conflict does have an effect but the very nature of the ecosystem also plays it part.

So, I take it from your experience and knowledge in the area, that even in the absence of HWC, lions living in this region will find it difficult to simply survive due to the lack of density in prey animals? Is that an accurate reading of your comment? If it is, any idea why they would intentionally move predators such as these into such an inhospitable place?


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Brahim - 12-01-2022

Hippo boy has a collar now, they say they will monitor and add females but who knows


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - sik94 - 12-01-2022

I spent longer than I'd like to admit on this haha worth it though.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/5y6-u7IfQsk


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Brahim - 12-01-2022

@sik94 update from that sighting is they caught a trichardt male but he's got some injuries nothing major. Next day both Trichardt met up on a elephant carcass. Satara males left the area.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Wyld@Heart - 12-01-2022

(12-01-2022, 10:42 AM)BA0701 Wrote: So, I take it from your experience and knowledge in the area, that even in the absence of HWC, lions living in this region will find it difficult to simply survive due to the lack of density in prey animals? Is that an accurate reading of your comment? If it is, any idea why they would  intentionally move predators such as these into such an inhospitable place?

There are lions, and indeed cheetah, hyena, leopard and wild dog, in the north as well as mostly all the prey animal species that are in the south so survivability is not just possible, but just about a 'given' insofar as predator populations can be spoken about as such given the harshness of the bush. But there are enough prey species and water sources for a self sustaining and viable lion population however in a much lower density per square kilometer with correspondingly larger territories than the south. It's certainly not as inhospitable as the truly arid areas where other lions survive and thrive, it's just dense mopani with lower density of the prey animals that they prefer. 

The idea of translocating these males so far north is probably because of such low densities. Competition in the south is fierce, as we know, and putting them pretty much anywhere south of Olifants would almost certainly see them come into conflict with males and prides already protecting litters so human intervention in that regard would have a direct effect on the population that could be negative to the current inhabitants and/or the males themselves which is not ideal. 

These sorts of things are always done with an idea to impact as little as possible on the existing lions in the area and the far north doesn't really have one to speak of except perhaps nomadic lions passing through and the relocation of these two kills two birds with one stone; they have a chance to establish themselves without risking other lions or themselves too much while also hopefully seeding and establishing a lion presence in an area that hasn't had a sedentary one for years. It's not the S25 with herds around every corner, but they can survive and do well there. Buffalo, in particular, are in plentiful supply if maybe not as compliant.


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Brahim - 12-01-2022


More of that Satara v Trichardt


RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Mdz123 - 12-02-2022

These might be some of the Nkuhlus, based on location in Skukuza




RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Mdz123 - 12-02-2022

Throwback: Kumana males in 2015




RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Mdz123 - 12-04-2022

Biyamiti male 



Gomondwane male




RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tonpa - 12-04-2022

End of the road 






RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Gavskrr - 12-04-2022

Are these Mpondo sons or are they part of the Gomondwane young? The author named them Tatu Males
" target="_blank" class="post_link">


" target="_blank" class="post_link">



RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 12-05-2022

I'm putting this here, as I honestly have no idea where it was filmed. Even after reading the comments, it is unclear where it was filmed, or who the two lions are. But, this lioness, who is likely defending cubs given her suckle marks, is flat out putting it on a male lion, giving him the business.







RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BigLion39 - 12-05-2022

(12-04-2022, 02:10 AM)Mdz123 Wrote: Biyamiti male

This boys eye has to bother him. You can see how swollen it is. Poor guy. Some lions you can see loose sight and the eye isn't swollen and some, like this Biyamiti male, his eye is almost double in size.