+- WildFact (https://wildfact.com/forum)
+-- Forum: Information Section (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-information-section)
+--- Forum: Terrestrial Wild Animals (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-terrestrial-wild-animals)
+--- Thread: Skulls, Skeletons, Canines & Claws (/topic-skulls-skeletons-canines-claws)
Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - tigerluver - 03-08-2017
(03-08-2017, 12:34 PM)Spalea Wrote: About #495 photo:
When I see the pantera atrox's skull size, I think this felid has a really big skull. Considering his size and weight (between 250 and 350 kilos) the difference with the Amur tiger is clearly due to something else. Pantera Atrox is the only one big cat whose average skull size exceeds cheefully the 40 centimeters (46 cms) while the average Amur tiger's skull size in length is 38 cm. Really big difference (20%)...
If the size difference is 20%, the size difference in volume would be (1,2) x (1,2) x (1,2) = 1,728 i.e. 72,8 %. Let us admit 70 %. We are in an other scale...
Was this big cat an intellectual felid ?
Of course this big brain doesn't avoid to this big cat in disappearing.
The final conclusion is correct, although I could add to the route to it.
Firstly, please check out this post.
As shown, (this specimen individual of) P. atrox does indeed have a higher felid encephalization quotient than all other individuals except the lynx specimen. So it'd be very logical and probably accurate to assume P. atrox was a very brainy cat, perhaps the brainiest in history.
However, I would caution against using volume extrapolations. For instance, tigers as compared to lions, have shorter skulls and narrower brain cases (this trait is shared with P. spelaea, causing misclassification by an author). Without a further detailed inspection of the brain cavity, one could understandably come to the conclusions that the lion has the bigger brain. However, Yagamuchi et al. (2009) found otherwise. While the paper did not bother to explain the reasoning, difference in skull structure distribution, such elongation of the snout at the cost of the brain case would traits one should be cognizant of determining which specimen has the bigger brain.
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - Spalea - 03-09-2017
@tigerluver :
About #512: Thank yu for the link you indicated me and for your explanations ! If I understand well lynx rufus and pantera atrox have the biggest log(brain mass)/log(body mass) ratio because their ratios are the most above of the line...
OK ! But the lynx rufus being an extant feline specy I don't know if we can remark a difference of behaviour compared to the other specy of lynx, "lynx lynx", or with the a extant same-sized felines species like the caracal aurata... A difference of behaviour due to its bigger ratio ? If yes or no answer, can we generalize for pantera atrox ?
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - GrizzlyClaws - 03-13-2017
African lion
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - GrizzlyClaws - 03-13-2017
African lion
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - epaiva - 03-16-2017
Jaguar Skull from Estado Cojedes, Venezuela in Museo de Historia Natural La Salle, Caracas, Venezuela. It measures 27 cm long 20 cm wide
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - GrizzlyClaws - 03-20-2017
Indochinese tiger
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - GrizzlyClaws - 03-22-2017
African lion
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - GrizzlyClaws - 03-22-2017
African lion
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Bear Canine Teeth and Claws - epaiva - 03-25-2017
(02-03-2017, 07:11 AM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote: Asiatic Black bearAsiatic Black Bear fangs look a lot bigger than American Black Bear fangs
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Bear Canine Teeth and Claws - epaiva - 03-25-2017
American Black Bear
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Bear Canine Teeth and Claws - GrizzlyClaws - 03-25-2017
(03-25-2017, 09:53 PM)epaiva Wrote: Asiatic Black Bear fangs look a lot bigger than American Black Bear fangs
I have noticed that as well. The Asiatic Black bear's fangs are bigger and more robust built than those of their American cousins.
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - epaiva - 03-26-2017
Puma from Venezuelan Andes.
@GrizzlyClaws
How do I measure the claws?
*This image is copyright of its original author
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - GrizzlyClaws - 03-27-2017
@epaiva
You have to fully extract it like this one.
*This image is copyright of its original author
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - epaiva - 03-27-2017
(03-08-2017, 11:21 PM)tigerluver Wrote:@tigerluver(03-08-2017, 05:26 PM)epaiva Wrote:(03-08-2017, 07:26 AM)GrizzlyClaws Wrote:@tigerluver(03-08-2017, 06:11 AM)epaiva Wrote: @GrizzlyClaws
What is the estimated size head and body length excluding the tail and height at the shoulders of Panthera Atrox, Panthera Fossilis, Panthera Spelaea and Ngandong Tiger?
I think @tigerluver could help you more on this issue, while I am more specialized on the canine/claw.
Hope you can help us with this important information
*This image is copyright of its original author
From this, I would increase the mass of P. spelaea to around 340 kg based on the occurrence of larger femurs and skulls that approach P. fossilis in size.
Did they find a complete skull of Panthera tigris soloensis?
It must be huge, the estimated size of that Tiger is Huge larger than all Prehistoric Big Cats
RE: Big Cat's Canines and Claws - tigerluver - 03-27-2017
@epaiva , No complete skull, but a nearly complete cranium and some mandibles.
The cranium is unimpressive by prehistoric cat terms. It is about 380-390 mm complete (which is on the large side for a modern tiger but not exceptional) and relatively thin for a tiger, though not out of range. Here's the vK cranium (the one on the far right; the mandible in the picture does not belong to the cranium):
*This image is copyright of its original author
The estimated size is based on a 480 mm femur.
*This image is copyright of its original author
The Ngandong femur, as well as the humerus which is of a smaller specimen, are very robust for a tiger and a pantherine in general. When just account for length, the Ngandong specimen would be around 400 kg if we take isometry (general equation is (fossil specimen/extant specimen)^3*weight extant specimen = weight fossil specimen assuming equal proportions) with the wild specimen I modeled above who would've weighed around 240 kg. When we take into account the add robusticity, the 450+ kg range for this specimen is rational.
I'm working on showing osteological comparisons of extinct giants and their contemporaries which will show similar comparisons as above.