Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Printable Version +- WildFact (https://wildfact.com/forum) +-- Forum: Information Section (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-information-section) +--- Forum: Terrestrial Wild Animals (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-terrestrial-wild-animals) +---- Forum: Wild Cats (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-wild-cats) +----- Forum: Lion (https://wildfact.com/forum/forum-lion) +----- Thread: Coalitions of Kruger National Park (/topic-coalitions-of-kruger-national-park) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
413
414
415
416
417
418
419
420
421
422
423
424
425
426
427
428
429
430
431
432
433
434
435
436
437
438
439
440
441
442
443
444
445
446
447
448
449
450
451
452
453
454
455
456
457
458
459
460
461
462
463
464
465
466
467
468
469
470
471
472
473
474
475
476
477
478
479
480
481
482
483
484
485
486
487
488
489
490
491
492
493
494
495
496
497
498
499
500
501
502
503
504
505
506
507
508
509
510
511
512
513
514
515
516
517
518
519
520
521
522
523
524
525
526
527
528
529
530
531
532
533
534
535
536
537
538
539
540
541
542
543
544
545
546
547
548
549
550
551
552
553
554
555
556
557
558
559
560
561
562
563
564
565
566
567
568
569
570
571
572
573
574
575
576
577
578
579
580
581
582
583
584
585
586
587
588
589
590
591
592
593
594
595
596
597
598
599
600
601
602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
614
615
616
617
618
619
620
621
622
623
624
625
626
627
628
629
630
631
632
633
634
635
636
637
638
639
640
641
642
643
644
645
646
647
648
649
650
651
652
653
654
655
656
657
658
659
660
661
662
663
664
665
666
667
668
669
670
671
672
673
674
675
676
677
678
679
680
681
682
683
684
685
686
687
688
689
690
691
692
693
694
695
696
697
698
699
700
701
702
703
704
705
706
707
708
709
710
711
712
713
714
715
716
717
718
719
720
721
722
723
724
725
726
727
728
729
730
731
732
733
734
735
736
737
738
739
740
741
742
743
744
745
746
747
748
749
750
751
752
753
754
755
756
757
758
759
760
761
762
763
764
765
766
767
768
769
770
771
772
773
774
775
776
777
778
779
780
781
782
783
784
785
|
RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BA0701 - 08-25-2023 (08-25-2023, 07:17 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote:(08-25-2023, 06:20 PM)BA0701 Wrote: Was this male branded? That scar seems awfully symmetrical. Ok, that makes sense, big boy for sure. I wonder why, if it exists, they won't release that kind of data, sure would end a lot of debates on the subject, or simply stop them before they started. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - T I N O - 08-25-2023 (08-25-2023, 07:57 PM)BA0701 Wrote:The Skybed males were also branded by the letter C(08-25-2023, 07:17 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote:(08-25-2023, 06:20 PM)BA0701 Wrote: Was this male branded? That scar seems awfully symmetrical. They were branded with the letter C on their back leg, that was because they were inoculated by a vet due to a rabies scare. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Mapokser - 08-25-2023 @Tr1x24 I remember multiple people claiming they weighed 635lbs and 683lbs respectively, saying there was a sheet from the vet who weighed them, with their info from the darting. Though nobody has ever showed any actual evidence of it. 683lbs, even if it was a full stomach weight, it'd be a record. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 08-26-2023 (08-25-2023, 11:32 PM)Mapokser Wrote: @Tr1x24 I remember multiple people claiming they weighed 635lbs and 683lbs respectively, saying there was a sheet from the vet who weighed them, with their info from the darting. Thats what, 280- 300kg? Maybe with extreme full belly male can reach that, as they can eat 30-40 kg of meat, this is picture of 1 Leeubron male with full belly back in early 2018 by Big on Wild: *This image is copyright of its original author But would they dart him when he is that full? That might bring complications, i think its not recommended to sedative anyone with full belly. So yea, if they where not full like this, i dont think those numbers are correct. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - T I N O - 08-26-2023 Leeubron males are something else. Just like the Black dam male, a true beast of male lion he was RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Mapokser - 08-26-2023 @Tr1x24 some lions were weighed with full stomachs in the past so I'm not sure if it would cause any problems. But they normally use baits to dart them. Iirc the biggest lion from Kruger weighed by Smuts in the 80s was 250kg but had a full stomach and was estimated at 225 empty. 683lb is exactly 309kg, coincidentally the number given to a lion also weighed with a full stomach in the 90s, which was witnessed by Rob the Ranger in the Waterberg Biosphere. I'm not sure if that reserve is big enough to have real competition though, many small reserves have like only 1 pride and coalition so they have an easy life and often grow bigger than the average ( and even become fat ) plus when the reserve owners go looking for new males to introduce to diversify the gene pool, they'd obviously look for big and healthy males. So this may or may not be the reason why this 90s lion was so huge ( again I don't know anything about that reserve ). However Leeubrons live a fully normal and wild life facing plenty of competition and were born without "eugenics" so to get to such a weight ( if true ) it'd be insane, even with a full stomach ( since let's be honest 309kg with an empty stomach is completely impossible ). RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Lipstick2 - 08-26-2023 (08-25-2023, 07:53 PM)Timbavati Wrote:(08-25-2023, 07:33 PM)Mdz123 Wrote: The Biyamitis Yeah, i agree. The Biyamitis are something specials (especially with their 2/3 distinctive blue coloured blind eyes on their opposite sides). Could we know anything about their origins? RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - BigLion39 - 08-26-2023 (08-26-2023, 06:49 AM)Lipstick2 Wrote: Yeah, i agree. The Biyamitis are something specials (especially with their 2/3 distinctive blue coloured blind eyes on their opposite sides). Aren't they sons of Eastern Bank Males? RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Brahim - 08-26-2023 Those weights are usually made up by people on Facebook with no reports actually existing RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Lipstick2 - 08-26-2023 (08-26-2023, 10:42 AM)BigLion39 Wrote:(08-26-2023, 06:49 AM)Lipstick2 Wrote: Yeah, i agree. The Biyamitis are something specials (especially with their 2/3 distinctive blue coloured blind eyes on their opposite sides). Yeah, i also have heard that meanwhile. I'm a bit wonder, because they don't show so much similarities with them imho. In which exact area they extended their territories right this time? RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 08-26-2023 (08-26-2023, 02:56 PM)Lipstick2 Wrote: Yeah, i also have heard that meanwhile. They are sons of EBMs and are very similar to them, aswell to their grandfathers, Toulon males. Here Silver eyed male and Diamond face Toulon: *This image is copyright of its original author They are territorial west of Skukuza on S1, near Kruger Gate, s65 road / Nwaswitshaka waterhole. They first ousted last Mpondo Snip Tail from Nwaswitshaka area later in 2021, then later in 2022 they expanded further north on S1, area which was occupied by 3 Renosterkoppies, they are prob the ones who mauled DM Renosterkoppies, which was prob fatal as he was not seen since. These guys were nomads since around 2 yrs of age, when their fathers lost territory to either Mjejanes, Mpondo or Young Jocks, maybe even mixture of those, as they where picked 1by1. After ~2 years of long nomadic life, they succeeded, at quite young age, they where around 4 when they ousted Snip Tail. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Brahim - 08-26-2023 Young Nkaya pan male. Credit: Alberto Scattolin RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Lipstick2 - 08-26-2023 (08-26-2023, 03:50 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote:(08-26-2023, 02:56 PM)Lipstick2 Wrote: Yeah, i also have heard that meanwhile. Thank you so much for your discussion. Indeed, they have face similarities from these pics, probably im just forgot the Toulon males' appearance 'cause didn't see them so long after/since they were ousted by the 5 Mantimahles from the southern SS. But i'm still seeing a major difference between them as if Biyamitis would have slightly longer manes than the Toulons had. So, they are quitely a succesful coalition for now. From their locations, is this means they're near to the 3 Phabeni males (and Fourways Blondie) and the 3 Yong Jocks/Berg en dal or which coalitions are they surrounded by? RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Tr1x24 - 08-26-2023 (08-26-2023, 05:09 PM)Lipstick2 Wrote: So, they are quitely a succesful coalition for now. From their locations, is this means they're near to the 3 Phabeni males (and Fourways Blondie) and the 3 Yong Jocks/Berg en dal or which coalitions are they surrounded by? West of them along S1 at Nyamundwa Dam are 2 Kambulas and Pretoriuskop male, looks like new territorial males there after Blodie and 3rd Phabeni. Southwest of them, around Transport Dam , 2 Renosterkoppies males made appearence with a pride. Southeast are s35 and KT Lubyelubye. East around Skukuza are Nkhulus currently. No, 3 Phabeni are further southwest, at Shitlave Dam and Pretoriuskop, and young Jocks are waaay down south. RE: Coalitions of Kruger National Park - Lipstick2 - 08-26-2023 (08-26-2023, 06:08 PM)Tr1x24 Wrote:(08-26-2023, 05:09 PM)Lipstick2 Wrote: So, they are quitely a succesful coalition for now. From their locations, is this means they're near to the 3 Phabeni males (and Fourways Blondie) and the 3 Yong Jocks/Berg en dal or which coalitions are they surrounded by? So, the 3 Phabenis and Fourways Blondie have splitted up? That's interesting. (I couldn't follow to most of the Kruger processes recently.) And what's up with last 2 Mjejanes? I've heard that last time, they're also near the area from the south probably, or are they also far more down to south like the Young Jocks? I didn't see so many updates on them recently. |